A Proposal for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma in the Ninth Edition Clinical TNM Classification.

IMPORTANCE

A subset of Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition TNM stage I and II human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma has undesirable outcomes, which might have contributed to a lack of success in phase III deintensification trials. Refining clinical stage groups, especially in the overabundant cN1/stage I group, has become important for treatment selection.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic importance of pretreatment lymph node (LN) characteristics to optimize case distribution and outcome homogeneity within the N classification system.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is an international multi-institutional retrospective prognostic cohort study. Analysis of human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma treated curatively from 4 institutions (International Collaboration of Oropharyngeal Cancer Network for N-Classification [ICON-N] dataset) provided a refined clinical staging proposal; an independent dataset (Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal [CHUM] dataset) validated the proposal. Neuroradiologists reviewed pretreatment computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging for nodal features, including presence or absence of abnormal LN(s), retropharyngeal LN, laterality, number of abnormal LN, and imaging-detected extranodal extension (iENE). Data were collected from February to May 2023, and data were analyzed from June to July 2023.

EXPOSURES

Definitive chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy or definitive surgery with or without postoperative chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was overall survival. A Cox proportional hazards multivariable model was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) and to derive an optimal clinical TNM stage classification (AHR-stage schema) incorporating the strongest prognostic nodal features within the UICC/AJCC eighth edition TNM framework after confirming the prognostication of iENE status. The performance (according to overall normalized scores and ranking) of the AHR-stage schema against the current UICC/AJCC eighth edition TNM staging system was evaluated for hazard consistency, hazard discrimination, prognostic importance, and sample size balance. Validation was performed in the CHUM dataset.

RESULTS

The ICON-N dataset comprised 2053 patients, including 1898 (92.5%) with cN-positive disease and 155 (7.5%) with cN0 disease; a total of 298 (14.5%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 60.6 (9.3) years. iENE-positive disease was identified in 710 of 1898 patients with cN-positive disease (37.4%). The median (range) follow-up was 5.1 (0.1-14.7) years. iENE was the strongest prognostic nodal feature in multivariable analysis; the AHR for iENE-positive vs iENE-positive disease was 2.43 (95% CI, 1.96-3.03) in the ICON-N dataset and 2.04 (95% CI, 1.28-3.23) in the CHUM dataset (n = 451). Reclassifying iENE-positive cases 1 stratum higher for N categorization without altering iENE-negative cases yielded an AHR-stage schema that outperformed the current TNM staging system in disease-free and overall survival with a lower (ie, better) overall normalized score (2 vs 3).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, reclassifying each N category 1 stratum higher for iENE-positive disease resulted in better disease-free and overall survival. The proposed new classification outperformed the currently TNM staging system in risk stratification and may facilitate future clinical trial design, outcomes research, and patient care.