World Obesity Federation, London, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):1225-1227. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.140. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
In recognition of the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), the past decade has seen three United Nations High-Level Meetings (UN HLMs) on NCDs. Yet progress in terms of political or financial commitments has been very slow. At the 2018 meeting, a political declaration was approved but featured language that had been watered down in terms of commitments. In "Competing Frames of Global Health Governance: An Analysis of Stakeholder Influence on the Political Declaration on Non-communicable Diseases," Suzuki et al analyze the documents that were submitted by Member States, non-governmental organizations and the private sector during the consultation period and conclude that the private sector and several high-income countries (HICs) appeared to oppose regulatory frameworks for products associated with NCDs, that wealthier countries resisted financing commitments, and that general power asymmetries affected the final document. This comment supports their findings and provides additional considerations for why the NCD response has yet to produce significant commitments.
认识到非传染性疾病(NCD)给全球带来的负担,过去十年已经举行了三次联合国非传染性疾病问题高级别会议(UN HLMs)。然而,在政治或财政承诺方面的进展非常缓慢。在 2018 年的会议上,批准了一项政治宣言,但其中的承诺措辞有所软化。在“全球卫生治理的竞争框架:对非传染性疾病问题政治宣言相关利益攸关方影响的分析”一文中,铃木等人分析了会员国、非政府组织和私营部门在磋商期间提交的文件,并得出结论,私营部门和一些高收入国家(HICs)似乎反对与 NCD 相关产品的监管框架,较富裕的国家抵制资助承诺,而普遍的权力不对称影响了最终文件。这条评论支持他们的研究结果,并提供了一些额外的考虑因素,说明为什么非传染性疾病应对措施尚未产生重大承诺。