Research Centres CRISS (Social Approaches to Health) and POLISSI (Health Policy and Systems - International Health), School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Research laboratory LAM (Les Afriques dans le Monde), Institute of Political Studies, CNRS/UMR 5115, Pessac, France.
Glob Public Health. 2022 Nov;17(11):2929-2945. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.2005114. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality globally. While international strategies for their prevention and control call for greater civil society participation, many observers regret the lack of a broad social movement to address these diseases. This study focuses on diabetes patients' associations engaged from 1991 to 2014 in Bamako, Mali, and explores what factors influenced their capacity to build a collective national movement to address this disease and shape policy reforms in this area. Our findings show that the emergence of such a movement was limited by several constraints. The focus of diabetes patients' associations on technical biomedical issues silenced the daily embodied experience of patients and reduced the use of human-rights approaches. Moreover, few financial, material and social resources coupled with a fragmented base limited the scope and strength of claims made by patients' associations to obtain treatment at reduced coasts. Finally, modes of actions performed failed to challenge more structural inequalities and imbalances of power. Exacerbated by limited political opportunities, these constraints weakened the associations' ability to drive policy change on diabetes. They reflect some of the current weaknesses of the global mobilisation to address diabetes and NCDs.
非传染性疾病(NCDs)是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因之一。虽然预防和控制这些疾病的国际战略呼吁加强民间社会的参与,但许多观察人士对缺乏广泛的社会运动来解决这些疾病感到遗憾。本研究关注的是 1991 年至 2014 年期间在马里巴马科参与的糖尿病患者协会,并探讨了哪些因素影响了他们建立一个集体的国家运动来解决这一疾病并塑造该领域政策改革的能力。我们的研究结果表明,这种运动的出现受到了几个限制因素的限制。糖尿病患者协会关注技术生物医学问题,使患者的日常身体体验沉默,并减少了使用人权方法。此外,由于资金、物质和社会资源匮乏,加上基础分散,限制了患者协会为降低治疗成本而提出的主张的范围和力度。最后,行动模式未能挑战更结构性的不平等和权力失衡。由于政治机会有限,这些限制削弱了协会推动糖尿病政策变革的能力。它们反映了全球应对糖尿病和非传染性疾病运动的一些当前弱点。