Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2 #10-01, Tahir Foundation Building, Singapore, 117549, Singapore.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05958-0.
The choices that policymakers make are shaped by how their problems are framed. At last, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have risen high on the global policy agenda, but there are many disputed issues. First, what are they? Their name refers not to what they are but what they are not. Second, where do their boundaries lie? What diseases are included? Third, should we view their causes as mainly biomedical, behavioural, or social, or a combination? Our failure to resolve these issues has been invoked as a reason for our limited progress in developing and implementing effective remedies. In this scoping review, we ask "What is known from the existing literature about how NCDs are framed in the global policy discourses?" We answer it by reviewing the frames employed in policy and academic discourses.
We searched nine electronic databases for articles published since inception to 31 May 2019. We also reviewed websites of eight international organisations to identify global NCDs policies. We extracted data and synthesised findings to identify key thematic frames.
We included 36 articles and nine policy documents on global NCDs policies. We identified five discursive domains that have been used and where there are differing perspectives. These are: "Expanding the NCDs frame to include mental health and air pollution"; "NCDs and their determinants"; "A rights-based approach to NCDs"; "Approaches to achieving policy coherence in NCDs globally"; and "NCDs as part of Sustainable Socio-economic Development". We further identified 12 frames within the five discursive domains.
This scoping review identifies issues that remain unresolved and points to a need for alignment of perspectives among global health policy actors, as well as synergies with those working on mental health, maternal health, and child health. The current COVID-19 pandemic warrants greater consideration of its impact on global NCDs policies. Future global strategies for NCDs need to consider explicitly how NCDs are framed in a changing global health discourse and ensure adequate alignment with implementation and global health issues. There is a need for global strategies to recognise the pertinent role of actors in shaping policy discourses.
政策制定者的选择受到其问题框架的影响。非传染性疾病(NCDs)终于成为全球政策议程的重点,但仍存在许多争议问题。首先,它们是什么?它们的名称不是指它们是什么,而是指它们不是什么。其次,它们的边界在哪里?包括哪些疾病?第三,我们应该将其病因主要视为生物医学、行为还是社会因素,还是多种因素的组合?我们未能解决这些问题,这被认为是我们在制定和实施有效补救措施方面进展有限的原因。在这项范围界定审查中,我们提出了一个问题,“现有文献中对于如何在全球政策话语中构建 NCD 有哪些了解?”我们通过审查政策和学术话语中使用的框架来回答这个问题。
我们检索了自成立以来至 2019 年 5 月 31 日发表的九种电子数据库中的文章,并审查了八个国际组织的网站,以确定全球 NCD 政策。我们提取数据并综合研究结果,以确定关键主题框架。
我们纳入了 36 篇关于全球 NCD 政策的文章和 9 份政策文件。我们确定了五个已被使用且存在不同观点的话语领域。这些领域是:“扩大 NCD 框架,纳入心理健康和空气污染”;“NCD 及其决定因素”;“NCD 以权利为基础的方法”;“在全球范围内实现 NCD 政策一致性的方法”;以及“NCD 作为可持续社会经济发展的一部分”。我们进一步在这五个话语领域中确定了 12 个框架。
这项范围界定审查确定了一些仍未解决的问题,并指出全球卫生政策行动者需要在观点上达成一致,以及与关注心理健康、孕产妇健康和儿童健康的行动者之间建立协同关系。当前的 COVID-19 大流行需要更加关注其对全球 NCD 政策的影响。未来的 NCD 全球战略需要明确考虑在不断变化的全球卫生话语中构建 NCD 的方式,并确保与实施和全球卫生问题的充分一致。全球战略需要认识到塑造政策话语的相关行动者的作用。