Department of Orthopedics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 23;22(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04865-7.
Recent research has proposed a classification of spinopelvic stiffness according to pelvic spatial orientation for risk stratification in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the influence of global alignment was not investigated, and this study evaluated the effect of global balance (sagittal vertical axis [SVA]) on spinopelvic motion.
We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive primary THA patients. We measured SVA, spinopelvic parameters (pelvic tilt [PT], pelvic incidence, and sacral slope), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), proximal femur angle (PFA), and cup version using functional radiographs of patients in the standing and upright sitting positions. Linear regression was performed to identify parameters related to global trunk alignment change (∆SVA). Spinopelvic stiffness was defined as PT position change < 10°, and a subset of patients with PT change < 0° was categorized into a paradoxical spinopelvic motion group.
One hundred twenty-four patients were analyzed (mean age: 65 years, 61% female). In univariate regression analysis, ∆TK, ∆LL, and ∆PFA were correlated to ∆SVA. In multivariate regression analysis, ΔLL (p < 0.001) and ΔPFA (p < 0.001) were found to be correlated to ΔSVA (ΔSVA = - 11.97 + 0.05ΔTK - 0.23ΔLL - 0.17ΔPFA; adjusted R = 0.558). Spinopelvic stiffness was observed in 40 patients (32%), including five (4%) with paradoxical motion (∆PT = - 3° ± 1°, p < 0.001) with characteristics of balanced standing global trunk alignment (standing SVA = - 1.0 ± 5.1 cm), similar stiffness of the lumbosacral spine (∆LL = - 7° ± 5°), higher hip motion (∆PFA = - 78° ± 6°, p = 0.017), and higher anterior trunk shift (∆SVA = 6.2 ± 2.0 cm, p = 0.003) from standing to sitting as compared to the stiffness group. Two of these five patients experienced dislocation events after THA.
The lumbosacral and hip motions were the major contributors to global alignment postural change. Paradoxical motion is a rare but dangerous clinical condition in THA that might be related to a disproportionally large trunk shift in the stiff lumbosacral spine causing excessive hip motion. In paradoxical motion, diminishing functional acetabular clearance during position change might pose the prosthesis at higher risk of impingement and instability than spinopelvic stiffness.
最近的研究根据骨盆空间方位提出了一种脊柱骨盆僵硬度分类方法,用于进行全髋关节置换术(THA)的风险分层。然而,尚未研究整体平衡的影响,本研究评估了整体平衡(矢状垂直轴[SVA])对脊柱骨盆运动的影响。
我们对连续的原发性 THA 患者进行了回顾性研究。我们测量了站立位和直立坐姿位时 SVA、脊柱骨盆参数(骨盆倾斜度[PT]、骨盆入射角和骶骨倾斜度)、胸腰椎后凸角(TK)、腰椎前凸角(LL)、股骨近端角(PFA)和杯倾斜度。使用线性回归来确定与整体躯干对线变化(ΔSVA)相关的参数。脊柱骨盆僵硬度定义为 PT 位置变化<10°,PT 变化<0°的亚组患者被归类为反常脊柱骨盆运动组。
共分析了 124 例患者(平均年龄:65 岁,61%为女性)。在单变量回归分析中,ΔTK、ΔLL 和 ΔPFA 与 ΔSVA 相关。在多变量回归分析中,ΔLL(p<0.001)和 ΔPFA(p<0.001)与 ΔSVA 相关(ΔSVA=-11.97+0.05ΔTK-0.23ΔLL-0.17ΔPFA;调整后的 R=0.558)。40 例(32%)患者出现脊柱骨盆僵硬,其中 5 例(4%)出现反常运动(ΔPT=-3°±1°,p<0.001),具有平衡的站立位整体躯干对线特征(站立位 SVA=-1.0±5.1cm),腰骶脊柱僵硬度相似(ΔLL=-7°±5°),髋关节活动度更高(ΔPFA=-78°±6°,p=0.017),从站立位到坐位时,前躯干移位更大(ΔSVA=6.2±2.0cm,p=0.003)。这 5 例患者中有 2 例在 THA 后发生了脱位事件。
腰骶部和髋关节运动是导致整体对线姿势变化的主要因素。反常运动是 THA 中一种罕见但危险的临床情况,可能与僵硬的腰骶脊柱中躯干过度移位导致髋关节活动度过大有关。在反常运动中,在位置变化过程中功能髋臼间隙减小可能会使假体面临更高的撞击和不稳定风险,而不是脊柱骨盆僵硬。