Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.034. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
The Lewinnek "safe zone" is not always predictive of stability after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recent studies have focused on functional hip motion as observed on lateral spine-pelvis-hip x-rays. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between the Lewinnek safe zone and the functional safe zone based on hip and pelvic motion in the sagittal plane.
Three hundred twenty hips (291 patients) underwent primary THA using computer navigation. Two hundred ninety-six of these hips (92.5%) were within the Lewinnek safe zone as determined by inclination of 40° ± 10° and anteversion of 15° ± 10°. All patients had preoperative and postoperative standing and sitting lateral spinopelvic x-rays. The combined sagittal index (CSI), a combination of sagittal acetabular and femoral position, was measured for each patient and used to assess the functional safe zone. Data analysis was performed to identify hips in the Lewinnek safe zone inside and outside the sagittal functional safe zone. Predictive factors for hips outside the functional safe zone were identified.
Of the 296 hips within the Lewinnek safe zone, 254 (85.8%) were also in the functional safe zone. Forty-two patients were outside the functional safe zone based on CSI; 19 had an increased standing CSI and 23 had a decreased sitting CSI, all were considered at risk for dislocation. Predictive factors for falling outside the functional safe zone were increased femoral mobility (P < .001, r = 0.632), decreased spinopelvic mobility (P < .001, r = 0.455), and pelvic incidence (P < .001, r = 0.400).
In this study, 14.2% of hips within the Lewinnek safe zone were outside the functional safe zone, identifying a potential reason hips dislocate despite having "normal" cup angles. The best predictor for falling outside the functional safe zone, both preoperatively and postoperatively, was femoral mobility, not the sagittal cup position (ie, cup anteinclination).
Level III, retrospective review.
Lewinnek“安全区”并不总是能预测全髋关节置换术 (THA) 后的稳定性。最近的研究集中在侧位脊柱-骨盆-髋关节 X 光片上观察到的功能性髋关节运动。本研究旨在评估基于矢状面髋关节和骨盆运动的 Lewinnek 安全区与功能安全区之间的相关性。
320 髋(291 例患者)接受计算机导航下初次 THA。其中 296 髋(92.5%)的倾斜度为 40°±10°,前倾角为 15°±10°,位于 Lewinnek 安全区内。所有患者术前和术后均行站立位和坐位侧位脊柱骨盆 X 线片检查。每位患者均测量了综合矢状指数 (CSI),即髋臼和股骨矢状位置的综合指数,用于评估功能安全区。数据分析旨在确定 Lewinnek 安全区内和外的功能安全区的髋关节。确定了位于功能安全区外的髋关节的预测因素。
在 296 髋位于 Lewinnek 安全区内的患者中,254 髋(85.8%)也位于功能安全区内。根据 CSI,42 例患者位于功能安全区外;19 例站立位 CSI 增加,23 例坐位 CSI 减少,均有脱位风险。位于功能安全区外的预测因素包括股骨活动度增加(P<.001,r=0.632)、脊柱骨盆活动度降低(P<.001,r=0.455)和骨盆入射角增大(P<.001,r=0.400)。
在本研究中,Lewinnek 安全区内的 14.2%的髋关节位于功能安全区外,这表明尽管杯角度“正常”,但髋关节仍有脱位的潜在原因。术前和术后位于功能安全区外的最佳预测因素是股骨活动度,而不是矢状面杯位置(即杯前倾角)。
III 级,回顾性研究。