• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支付生态系统服务计划对内蒙古植被数量和质量恢复的影响评估。

Impact evaluation of a payments for ecosystem services program on vegetation quantity and quality restoration in Inner Mongolia.

机构信息

Center for Intelligent Ecology and Sustainability, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Rd., Hangzhou, 310058, China.

Inner Mongolia Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 22 Zhaojun Rd., Hohhot, 010031, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 1;303:114113. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114113. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114113
PMID:34815155
Abstract

Globally, the payments for ecosystem services (PES) program has become a helpful tool that serves the purpose of mitigating ecosystem degradation and protecting ecosystem services. However, the ecological effects of existing PES programs based on counterfactual baselines, quantification and sophisticated statistical analyses are still poorly understood. Taking Inner Mongolia as an example, this study evaluated the ecological effectiveness of the Natural Forest Conservation Program (NFCP) using the matching approach. The findings are as follows. First, 49.8% and 41.5% of the townships had significant gains in vegetation quantity and quality between 2000 and 2015, respectively; while 9.5% and 13.7% of the townships had significant losses in vegetation quantity and quality, respectively. Second, for forest quantity recovered townships, comparing to the NFCP unenrolled townships, the enrolled townships had increased forest quantity by additional 0.377 million ha (5.2%) from 2000 to 2015. Third, for forest quality recovered townships, the enrolled townships on average additionally increased forest quality by 465.513 Gg carbon (3.6%) from 2000 to 2015. Our study helps to promote sophisticated impact evaluation of conservation policies, which would improve the understanding and management of conservation practices in China and abroad.

摘要

全球范围内,生态系统服务支付(PES)计划已成为一种有用的工具,有助于减轻生态系统退化和保护生态系统服务。然而,基于反事实基准、量化和复杂统计分析的现有 PES 计划的生态效应仍知之甚少。本研究以内蒙古为例,采用匹配方法评估了天然林保护计划(NFCP)的生态有效性。研究结果如下。首先,2000 年至 2015 年期间,分别有 49.8%和 41.5%的乡镇在植被数量和质量方面有显著提高;而分别有 9.5%和 13.7%的乡镇在植被数量和质量方面有显著下降。其次,对于森林数量恢复的乡镇,与未参与 NFCP 的乡镇相比,参与 NFCP 的乡镇在 2000 年至 2015 年间额外增加了 0.377 万公顷(5.2%)的森林面积。第三,对于森林质量恢复的乡镇,参与乡镇在 2000 年至 2015 年间平均额外增加了 465.513 Gg 碳(3.6%)的森林质量。本研究有助于促进保护政策的复杂影响评估,从而提高国内外对保护实践的理解和管理。

相似文献

1
Impact evaluation of a payments for ecosystem services program on vegetation quantity and quality restoration in Inner Mongolia.支付生态系统服务计划对内蒙古植被数量和质量恢复的影响评估。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 1;303:114113. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114113. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
2
Performance and prospects of payments for ecosystem services programs: evidence from China.生态系统服务付费项目的绩效与前景:来自中国的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Sep 30;127:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 May 15.
3
Changes in ecosystem services and an analysis of driving factors for China's Natural Forest Conservation Program.中国天然林保护工程生态系统服务变化及驱动因素分析
Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar 9;9(7):3700-3716. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4925. eCollection 2019 Apr.
4
Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services.中国生态系统服务政策的生态和社会经济影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 15;105(28):9477-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706436105. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
5
Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico reduce forest fragmentation.墨西哥的生态系统服务付费减少了森林破碎化。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Dec;28(8):1982-1997. doi: 10.1002/eap.1753. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
6
Quantifying the Impact of the Grain-for-Green Program on Ecosystem Health in the Typical Agro-Pastoral Ecotone: A Case Study in the Xilin Gol League, Inner Mongolia.量化退耕还林工程对农牧交错带典型生态系统健康的影响——以内蒙古锡林郭勒盟为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 5;17(16):5631. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165631.
7
Effects of conservation policy on China's forest recovery.保护政策对中国森林恢复的影响。
Sci Adv. 2016 Mar 18;2(3):e1500965. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500965. eCollection 2016 Mar.
8
Difference in the net value of ecological services between natural and artificial forests in China.中国天然林和人工林生态服务净价值的差异。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Oct;33(5):1076-1083. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13293. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
9
Feedback effect of crop raiding in payments for ecosystem services.作物盗猎对生态系统服务付费的反馈效应。
Ambio. 2019 Jul;48(7):732-740. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1105-0. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
10
Labor force transfer, vegetation restoration and ecosystem service in the Qilian Mountains.祁连山劳动力转移、植被恢复与生态系统服务
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 15;288:112387. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112387. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of Multi-Land Use Decisions on Temperate Forest Habitat Quality in the Changbai Mountain Region, Northeast China.中国东北长白山地区多土地利用决策对温带森林栖息地质量的影响
Ecol Evol. 2025 Mar 27;15(4):e71123. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71123. eCollection 2025 Apr.