• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生态系统服务付费项目的绩效与前景:来自中国的证据。

Performance and prospects of payments for ecosystem services programs: evidence from China.

机构信息

Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823-5243, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2013 Sep 30;127:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.019
PMID:23685121
Abstract

Systematic evaluation of the environmental and socioeconomic effects of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs is crucial for guiding policy design and implementation. We evaluated the performance of the Natural Forest Conservation Program (NFCP), a national PES program of China, in the Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. The environmental effects of the NFCP were evaluated through a historical trend (1965-2001) analysis of forest cover to estimate a counter-factual (i.e., without-PES) forest cover baseline for 2007. The socioeconomic effects of the NFCP were evaluated using data collected through household interviews carried out before and after NFCP implementation in 2001. Our results suggest that the NFCP was not only significantly associated with increases in forest cover, but also had both positive (e.g., labor reduction for fuelwood collection) and negative (e.g., economic losses due to crop raiding by wildlife) effects on local households. Results from this study emphasize the importance of integrating local conditions and understanding underlying mechanisms to enhance the performance of PES programs. Our findings are useful for the design and implementation of successful conservation policies not only in our study area but also in similar places around the world.

摘要

系统评估生态系统服务付费(PES)计划的环境和社会经济影响对于指导政策设计和实施至关重要。我们评估了中国国家 PES 计划——天然林保护工程(NFCP)在卧龙大熊猫自然保护区的表现。通过对森林覆盖的历史趋势(1965-2001 年)分析来评估 NFCP 的环境影响,以估算 2007 年无 PES 的森林覆盖基线。使用 2001 年 NFCP 实施前后进行的入户访谈收集的数据评估 NFCP 的社会经济影响。我们的结果表明,NFCP 不仅与森林覆盖的增加显著相关,而且对当地家庭产生了积极(例如,减少砍柴的劳动力)和消极(例如,野生动物对农作物的侵害造成的经济损失)影响。这项研究的结果强调了将当地条件和理解潜在机制纳入 PES 计划以提高其绩效的重要性。我们的研究结果不仅对我们研究区,而且对全球类似地区的成功保护政策的设计和实施都具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Performance and prospects of payments for ecosystem services programs: evidence from China.生态系统服务付费项目的绩效与前景:来自中国的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Sep 30;127:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 May 15.
2
Effects of payments for ecosystem services on wildlife habitat recovery.生态系统服务付费对野生动物栖息地恢复的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Aug;30(4):827-35. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12669. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
3
Feedback effect of crop raiding in payments for ecosystem services.作物盗猎对生态系统服务付费的反馈效应。
Ambio. 2019 Jul;48(7):732-740. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1105-0. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
4
Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services.中国生态系统服务政策的生态和社会经济影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 15;105(28):9477-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706436105. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
5
Heterogeneous and interactive effects of payments for ecosystem services on household income across giant panda nature reserves.大熊猫自然保护区生态系统服务付费对家庭收入的异质性和交互效应
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 18;10(15):e34866. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34866. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
6
Impact evaluation of a payments for ecosystem services program on vegetation quantity and quality restoration in Inner Mongolia.支付生态系统服务计划对内蒙古植被数量和质量恢复的影响评估。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 1;303:114113. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114113. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
7
Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services.利用具有成本效益的目标定位来提高生态系统服务付费中保护投资的效率。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Dec;24(6):1469-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01551.x.
8
Changes in ecosystem services and an analysis of driving factors for China's Natural Forest Conservation Program.中国天然林保护工程生态系统服务变化及驱动因素分析
Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar 9;9(7):3700-3716. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4925. eCollection 2019 Apr.
9
Effects of conservation policy on China's forest recovery.保护政策对中国森林恢复的影响。
Sci Adv. 2016 Mar 18;2(3):e1500965. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500965. eCollection 2016 Mar.
10
Ecology. Giant pandas in a changing landscape.生态学。变化环境中的大熊猫。
Science. 2001 Nov 16;294(5546):1465. doi: 10.1126/science.1064710.

引用本文的文献

1
Wild Ungulates and Cattle Have Different Effects on Litter Decomposition as Revealed by Fecal Addition in a Northeast Asian Temperate Forest.粪便添加实验揭示东北亚温带森林中野生有蹄类动物和牛对凋落物分解有不同影响
Ecol Evol. 2024 Nov 14;14(11):e70529. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70529. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss.全球保护区在抵御生境丧失方面的混合效力。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 27;15(1):8389. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52693-9.
3
Heterogeneous and interactive effects of payments for ecosystem services on household income across giant panda nature reserves.
大熊猫自然保护区生态系统服务付费对家庭收入的异质性和交互效应
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 18;10(15):e34866. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34866. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
4
Spatial variations and mechanisms for the stability of water use efficiency in China.中国水分利用效率稳定性的空间变异及其机制
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Sep 21;14:1254395. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1254395. eCollection 2023.
5
Leveraging the metacoupling framework for sustainability science and global sustainable development.利用元耦合框架促进可持续性科学与全球可持续发展。
Natl Sci Rev. 2023 Mar 31;10(7):nwad090. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwad090. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Transformative adaptation through nature-based solutions: a comparative case study analysis in China, Italy, and Germany.通过基于自然的解决方案实现转型适应:中国、意大利和德国的比较案例研究分析
Reg Environ Change. 2023;23(2):69. doi: 10.1007/s10113-023-02066-7. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
Effects of global shocks on the evolution of an interconnected world.全球冲击对相互关联世界的演变的影响。
Ambio. 2023 Jan;52(1):95-106. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01778-0. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
8
Interventional Impacts of Watershed Ecological Compensation on Regional Economic Differences: Evidence from Xin'an River, China.流域生态补偿对区域经济差异的干预影响:来自中国新安江的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 2;17(17):6389. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176389.
9
Prohibited Grazing Policy Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction in Rural Northwest China-A Case Study in Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.禁止放牧政策对中国西北地区农村地区牧民生活满意度的影响——以宁夏回族自治区盐池县为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 8;16(22):4374. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224374.
10
Resilience building of rural livelihoods in PES programmes: A case study in China's Loess Hills.农村生计的韧性建设在 PES 项目中:来自中国黄土丘陵区的案例研究。
Ambio. 2020 Apr;49(4):962-985. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01236-4. Epub 2019 Sep 3.