Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; UCL Ear Institute, Faculty of Brain Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan-Feb;89(1):79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
The benefit of corticosteroids following facial nerve neurorrhaphy in the setting of complete transection is questionable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate corticosteroid efficacy on facial nerve regeneration and functional recovery after complete disruption and neurorrhaphy.
Randomized controlled trials on both human and animal models from Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE studying corticosteroid efficacy in complete facial nerve disruption followed by neurorrhaphy were included. Data were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis. The outcomes were evaluated from electrophysiology, histology, and functional recovery. However, no randomized controlled trial in human was performed. Possibly, performing human trials with histopathology may not be feasible in clinical setting.
Six animal studies (248 participants) met inclusion criteria. Electrophysiologic outcomes revealed no differences in latency (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = -1.97, 95% CI -7.38 to 3.44, p = 0.47) and amplitude (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI -0.44 to 1.18, p = 0.37) between systemic corticosteroids and controls. When analysis compared topical corticosteroid and control, the results provided no differences in latency (Mean Difference (MD) = 0.10, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.24, p = 0.16) and amplitude (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.10, p = 0.81). In histologic outcomes, the results showed no differences in axon diameter (MD = 0.13, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.41, p = 0.37) between systemic corticosteroid and control; however, the result in myelin thickness (MD = 0.06, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.08, p < 0.05) favored control group. When comparing systemic corticosteroid with control in eye blinking, the results favored control (MD = 1.33, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.06, p = 0.0004).
This evidence did not show potential benefits of systemic or topical corticosteroid deliveries after facial nerve neurorrhaphy in complete transection when evaluating electrophysiologic, histologic, and functional recovery outcomes in animal models.
在完全横断的情况下,面神经神经吻合后使用皮质类固醇的益处是值得怀疑的。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估皮质类固醇激素对面神经完全断裂后再生和功能恢复的疗效。
纳入了在 Ovid MEDLINE 和 Ovid EMBASE 上发表的关于人类和动物模型的随机对照试验,研究了皮质类固醇激素在完全面神经断裂后神经吻合中的疗效。提取数据并进行荟萃分析。从电生理学、组织学和功能恢复三个方面评估结果。但是,没有在人类中进行随机对照试验。在临床环境中,进行具有组织病理学的人类试验可能不可行。
6 项动物研究(248 名参与者)符合纳入标准。电生理结果显示,潜伏期(标准化均数差(SMD)=-1.97,95%CI-7.38 至 3.44,p=0.47)和振幅(SMD=0.37,95%CI-0.44 至 1.18,p=0.37)方面,全身皮质类固醇激素与对照组之间无差异。当分析比较局部皮质类固醇激素和对照组时,结果显示潜伏期(平均差(MD)=0.10,95%CI-0.04 至 0.24,p=0.16)和振幅(SMD=0.01,95%CI-0.08 至 0.10,p=0.81)方面无差异。在组织学结果中,结果显示全身皮质类固醇激素与对照组之间的轴突直径无差异(MD=0.13,95%CI-0.15 至 0.41,p=0.37);然而,髓鞘厚度的结果(MD=0.06,95%CI 0.04 至 0.08,p<0.05)有利于对照组。当比较全身皮质类固醇激素与对照组的眨眼时,结果有利于对照组(MD=1.33,95%CI 0.60 至 2.06,p=0.0004)。
在评估动物模型的电生理、组织学和功能恢复结果时,本证据并未显示面神经神经吻合后完全横断时全身或局部皮质类固醇激素给药的潜在益处。