Suppr超能文献

预防持续性 COVID-19 后嗅觉功能障碍的干预措施。

Interventions for the prevention of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.

机构信息

Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 5;9(9):CD013877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013877.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loss of olfactory function is well recognised as a symptom of COVID-19 infection, and the pandemic has resulted in a large number of individuals with abnormalities in their sense of smell. For many, the condition is temporary and resolves within two to four weeks. However, in a significant minority the symptoms persist. At present, it is not known whether early intervention with any form of treatment (such as medication or olfactory training) can promote recovery and prevent persisting olfactory disturbance. This is an update of the 2021 review with four studies added.

OBJECTIVES

  1. To evaluate the benefits and harms of any intervention versus no treatment for people with acute olfactory dysfunction due to COVID-19 infection.  2) To keep the evidence up-to-date, using a living systematic review approach.  SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the latest search was 20 October 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people with COVID-19 related olfactory disturbance, which had been present for less than four weeks. We included any intervention compared to no treatment or placebo.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were the presence of normal olfactory function, serious adverse effects and change in sense of smell. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of parosmia, change in sense of taste, disease-related quality of life and other adverse effects (including nosebleeds/bloody discharge). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.  MAIN RESULTS: We included five studies with 691 participants. The studies evaluated the following interventions: intranasal corticosteroid sprays, intranasal corticosteroid drops, intranasal hypertonic saline and zinc sulphate.  Intranasal corticosteroid spray compared to no intervention/placebo We included three studies with 288 participants who had olfactory dysfunction for less than four weeks following COVID-19. Presence of normal olfactory function The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of intranasal corticosteroid spray on both self-rated recovery of olfactory function and recovery of olfactory function using psychophysical tests at up to four weeks follow-up (self-rated: risk ratio (RR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.68; 1 study; 100 participants; psychophysical testing: RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.63; 1 study; 77 participants; very low-certainty evidence).  Change in sense of smell The evidence is also very uncertain about the effect of intranasal corticosteroid spray on self-rated change in the sense of smell (at less than 4 weeks: mean difference (MD) 0.5 points lower, 95% CI 1.38 lower to 0.38 higher; 1 study; 77 participants; at > 4 weeks to 3 months: MD 2.4 points higher, 95% CI 1.32 higher to 3.48 higher; 1 study; 100 participants; very low-certainty evidence, rated on a scale of 1 to 10, higher scores mean better olfactory function). Intranasal corticosteroids may make little or no difference to the change in sense of smell when assessed with psychophysical testing (MD 0.2 points, 95% CI 2.06 points lower to 2.06 points higher; 1 study; 77 participants; low-certainty evidence, 0- to 24-point scale, higher scores mean better olfactory function).  Serious adverse effects The authors of one study reported no adverse effects, but their intention to collect these data was not pre-specified so we are uncertain if these were systematically sought and identified. The remaining two studies did not report on adverse effects.  Intranasal corticosteroid drops compared to no intervention/placebo We included one study with 248 participants who had olfactory dysfunction for ≤ 15 days following COVID-19. Presence of normal olfactory function Intranasal corticosteroid drops may make little or no difference to self-rated recovery at > 4 weeks to 3 months (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.11; 1 study; 248 participants; low-certainty evidence). No other outcomes were assessed by this study.  Data on the use of hypertonic saline nasal irrigation and the use of zinc sulphate to prevent persistent olfactory dysfunction are included in the full text of the review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is very limited evidence available on the efficacy and harms of treatments for preventing persistent olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19 infection. However, we have identified a number of ongoing trials in this area. As this is a living systematic review we will update the data regularly, as new results become available.

摘要

背景

失去嗅觉功能是 COVID-19 感染的一个公认症状,大流行导致大量个体嗅觉异常。对于许多人来说,这种情况是暂时的,会在两到四周内恢复。然而,在少数情况下,症状会持续存在。目前,尚不清楚早期干预(如药物治疗或嗅觉训练)是否可以促进康复并防止持续的嗅觉障碍。这是对 2021 年综述的更新,增加了四项研究。

目的

1)评估任何干预措施与 COVID-19 感染引起的急性嗅觉功能障碍患者不治疗相比的获益和危害。2)通过使用实时系统评价方法,使证据保持最新。

检索策略

Cochrane ENT 信息专家检索了 Cochrane ENT 登记册;CENTRAL;Ovid MEDLINE;Ovid Embase;Web of Science;ClinicalTrials.gov;ICTRP 和其他未发表试验的来源。最新检索日期为 2021 年 10 月 20 日。

选择标准

我们纳入了 COVID-19 相关嗅觉障碍患者的随机对照试验(RCT),其出现时间不到四周。我们纳入了任何与无治疗或安慰剂相比的干预措施。

数据收集和分析

我们使用了标准的 Cochrane 方法。我们的主要结局是嗅觉功能正常的存在、严重不良事件和嗅觉变化。次要结局是味觉障碍的发生率、嗅觉变化、疾病相关生活质量和其他不良反应(包括鼻出血/血性分泌物)。我们使用 GRADE 评估每个结局的证据确定性。

主要结果

我们纳入了五项研究,涉及 691 名参与者。这些研究评估了以下干预措施:鼻内皮质类固醇喷雾剂、鼻内皮质类固醇滴剂、鼻内高渗盐水和硫酸锌。

与无干预/安慰剂相比,鼻内皮质类固醇喷雾剂

我们纳入了三项研究,涉及 288 名 COVID-19 后嗅觉功能障碍不到四周的参与者。

嗅觉功能正常

鼻腔皮质类固醇喷雾剂对自我评估的嗅觉功能恢复和使用心理物理测试在四周随访时嗅觉功能恢复的影响证据非常不确定(自我评估:风险比(RR)1.19,95%置信区间(CI)0.85 至 1.68;1 项研究;100 名参与者;心理物理测试:RR 2.3,95% CI 1.16 至 4.63;1 项研究;77 名参与者;极低确定性证据)。

嗅觉变化

鼻腔皮质类固醇喷雾剂对自我评估的嗅觉变化的影响证据也非常不确定(不到 4 周:差异平均(MD)低 0.5 分,95% CI 低 1.38 分至 0.38 分高;1 项研究;77 名参与者;> 4 周至 3 个月:MD 高 2.4 分,95% CI 高 1.32 分至 3.48 分;1 项研究;100 名参与者;极低确定性证据,1 至 10 分,分数越高表示嗅觉功能越好)。

使用心理物理测试评估时,鼻内皮质类固醇可能对嗅觉变化影响不大(MD 0.2 分,95% CI 低 2.06 分至 2.06 分高;1 项研究;77 名参与者;低确定性证据,0 至 24 分量表,分数越高表示嗅觉功能越好)。

严重不良事件

一项研究的作者报告没有不良反应,但他们收集这些数据的意图没有预先规定,因此我们不确定这些数据是否系统地进行了收集和识别。其余两项研究没有报告不良反应。

与无干预/安慰剂相比,鼻内皮质类固醇滴剂

我们纳入了一项涉及 248 名 COVID-19 后嗅觉功能障碍≤ 15 天的参与者的研究。

嗅觉功能正常

鼻内皮质类固醇滴剂在> 4 周至 3 个月时自我评估的恢复可能没有差异(RR 1.00,95% CI 0.89 至 1.11;1 项研究;248 名参与者;低确定性证据)。这项研究没有评估其他结局。

关于高渗盐水鼻腔冲洗和硫酸锌预防持续性嗅觉障碍的使用的数据包含在综述的全文中。

作者结论

关于 COVID-19 感染后预防持续性嗅觉障碍的治疗方法的疗效和危害的证据非常有限。然而,我们已经在这一领域确定了一些正在进行的试验。由于这是一个实时的系统评价,我们将定期更新数据,因为新的结果会不断出现。

相似文献

3
Saline irrigation for allergic rhinitis.用于变应性鼻炎的盐水冲洗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 22;6(6):CD012597. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012597.pub2.
4
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.
5
Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的全身抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD013052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013052.pub2.
7
Inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19.吸入性皮质类固醇治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 9;3(3):CD015125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015125.
8
Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus.银杏叶治疗耳鸣。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 16;11(11):CD013514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013514.pub2.
9
Antihistamines for motion sickness.抗组胺药治疗晕动病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 17;10(10):CD012715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012715.pub2.
10
Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19.全身性皮质类固醇治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD014963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014963.

引用本文的文献

6
[Post-COVID-19 syndrome].[新冠后综合征]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2023 Jun;207(6):812-820. doi: 10.1016/j.banm.2023.01.029. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
8
Neuropsychiatric aspects of long COVID: A comprehensive review.长新冠的神经精神方面:全面综述。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Feb;77(2):84-93. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13508. Epub 2022 Dec 12.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验