• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筛查结肠镜检查诊断质量的日间变化:一项基于登记处的研究。

Time-of-day variation in the diagnostic quality of screening colonoscopies: a registry-based study.

作者信息

Jaho File, Kroijer Rasmus, Ploug Magnus

机构信息

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hospital South West Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark.

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov-Dec;34(6):815-819. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0668. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

DOI:10.20524/aog.2021.0668
PMID:34815647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8596217/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic quality of screening colonoscopies has been found to differ between morning and afternoon. Specifically, the adenoma detection rate (ADR) is higher in the morning. Our aim was to assess if time-of-day dependent differences in colonoscopy quality exist in a Danish screening setting. Following national screening guidelines, an individual will be exempt from screening invitations for 8 years if the colonoscopy is without pathology. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to identify factors systematically affecting the detection of lesions.

METHODS

This was a single-center study of screening colonoscopies performed between 2014 and 2018. Records were retrieved from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database and coupled with local data. The ADR and the cecal intubation rate were compared between morning (8-12 a.m.) and afternoon (12-4 p.m.) colonoscopies. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 3659 screening colonoscopies were included. The ADR was 51% in the morning and 58% in the afternoon. Multivariate analysis found this statistically significant, with the "afternoon vs. morning" odds ratio for adenoma detection being 1.4 (95% confidence interval 1.17-1.68; P<0.001). The cecal intubation rate was 95.6% in the morning and 94.7%, a non-significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADR of screening colonoscopies was higher in the afternoon. Our study highlights the need for local/regional evaluation of factors affecting colonoscopy quality to address such issues. A clean colonoscopy exempts the patient from subsequent screening invitations for 8 years. Therefore, any observed systematic differences in quality must be addressed and eliminated.

摘要

背景

已发现筛查性结肠镜检查的诊断质量在上午和下午有所不同。具体而言,腺瘤检出率(ADR)在上午更高。我们的目的是评估在丹麦的筛查环境中是否存在结肠镜检查质量的时间依赖性差异。根据国家筛查指南,如果结肠镜检查未发现病变,个人将在8年内免于筛查邀请。因此,识别系统影响病变检测的因素至关重要。

方法

这是一项对2014年至2018年间进行的筛查性结肠镜检查的单中心研究。记录从丹麦结直肠癌筛查数据库中检索,并与本地数据相结合。比较上午(上午8点至12点)和下午(下午12点至4点)结肠镜检查的ADR和盲肠插管率。进行多变量逻辑回归分析。

结果

共纳入3659例筛查性结肠镜检查。上午的ADR为51%,下午为58%。多变量分析发现这具有统计学意义,腺瘤检测的“下午与上午”优势比为1.4(95%置信区间1.17 - 1.68;P<0.001)。上午的盲肠插管率为95.6%,下午为94.7%,差异无统计学意义。

结论

筛查性结肠镜检查的ADR在下午更高。我们的研究强调需要对影响结肠镜检查质量的因素进行本地/区域评估,以解决此类问题。一次清洁的结肠镜检查可使患者在随后8年内免于筛查邀请。因此,任何观察到的质量系统差异都必须得到解决并消除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1d5/8596217/5a08f54c01d0/AnnGastroenterol-34-815-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1d5/8596217/38d11d0b1291/AnnGastroenterol-34-815-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1d5/8596217/5a08f54c01d0/AnnGastroenterol-34-815-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1d5/8596217/38d11d0b1291/AnnGastroenterol-34-815-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1d5/8596217/5a08f54c01d0/AnnGastroenterol-34-815-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Time-of-day variation in the diagnostic quality of screening colonoscopies: a registry-based study.筛查结肠镜检查诊断质量的日间变化:一项基于登记处的研究。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov-Dec;34(6):815-819. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0668. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
2
Comparison of procedural outcomes between morning and afternoon colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons.上午和下午由结直肠外科医生进行结肠镜检查的操作结果比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6543-6550. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09022-2. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
3
Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.上午进行结肠镜检查与提高腺瘤检出率有关。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1796-803. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4448-7. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
4
Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy.腺瘤在上午进行结肠镜检查时比下午更容易被检测到。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;104(7):1659-64; quiz 1665. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.249. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
5
Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks.腺瘤检出率不受在半天时间段内进行结肠镜检查的时间影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug;106(8):1466-71. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.125. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
6
Does time of day matter for colonoscopy quality? A review of over 13,000 screening colonoscopies in a colorectal surgery unit.一天中的时间对结肠镜检查质量有影响吗?对肛肠外科 13000 余例筛查性结肠镜检查的回顾性研究。
Am J Surg. 2022 Mar;223(3):500-502. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.11.032. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
7
Differences between morning and afternoon colonoscopies for adenoma detection in female and male patients.女性和男性患者中,上午和下午进行结肠镜检查以检测腺瘤的差异。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct-Dec;29(4):497-501. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0079. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
8
Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position.腺瘤检出率不受整日排班、时间或改良候诊顺序的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr;75(4):827-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
9
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.筛查结肠镜检查的质量指标、结肠镜检查医师的表现及随后发生间隔期结直肠癌的风险:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Nov;17(11):2265-2300. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003927.
10
Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.基于新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据,在筛查性结肠镜检查与监测性结肠镜检查中,腺瘤和锯齿状息肉的检出率存在差异。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct;11(10):1308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.042. Epub 2013 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance colonoscopy adenoma detection in clinical practice: a prospective observational trial.评估人工智能在临床实践中增强结肠镜腺瘤检测的潜力:一项前瞻性观察性试验。
Clin Endosc. 2024 Nov;57(6):783-789. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.038. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods.用于结直肠息肉定位方法的临床验证基准数据集和专家性能基线
J Imaging. 2023 Aug 22;9(9):167. doi: 10.3390/jimaging9090167.
3
The Role of an Artificial Intelligence Method of Improving the Diagnosis of Neoplasms by Colonoscopy.

本文引用的文献

1
Morning versus afternoon adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早晚腺瘤检出率的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Apr;32(4):467-474. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001596.
2
Factors predicting the colorectal adenoma detection rate in colonoscopic screening of a Chinese population: A prospective study.中国人群结肠镜筛查中结直肠腺瘤检出率的预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(15):e15103. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015103.
3
Comparison of efficacy of colonoscopy between the morning and afternoon: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
一种通过结肠镜检查改善肿瘤诊断的人工智能方法的作用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 13;13(4):701. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040701.
4
Influence of Artificial Intelligence on the Adenoma Detection Rate throughout the Day.人工智能对全天腺瘤检出率的影响。
Dig Dis. 2023;41(4):615-619. doi: 10.1159/000528163. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
结肠镜检查上午和下午疗效的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Jul;50(7):661-667. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.03.035. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
4
Diagnostic yield is not influenced by the timing of screening endoscopy: morning versus afternoon.诊断率不受筛查内镜检查时间(上午与下午)的影响。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;53(3):365-369. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1433230. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
5
Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer.腺瘤检出率与结直肠癌风险
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug;31(4):441-446. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.下消化道内镜检查的性能指标:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Apr;5(3):309-334. doi: 10.1177/2050640617700014. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.下消化道内镜检查的性能指标:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议
Endoscopy. 2017 Apr;49(4):378-397. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-103411. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
8
Adenoma detection rates decline with increasing procedural hours in an endoscopist's workload.腺瘤检出率随内镜医师工作量中操作时间的增加而下降。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug-Sep;29(6):304-8. doi: 10.1155/2015/789038. Epub 2015 May 21.
9
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):31-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
10
Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.内镜医师疲劳可能导致结肠镜筛查有效性下降。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;49(6):e51-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000175.