Shahu Andi, Okunrintemi Victor, Tibuakuu Martin, Khan Safi U, Gulati Martha, Marvel Francoise, Blumenthal Roger S, Michos Erin D
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Nov 6;8:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100286. eCollection 2021 Dec.
: Associations between income disparity and utilization of cardiovascular disease (CVD) preventive care services, such as receipt of lifestyle advice and screening for CVD risk factors in populations with and without CVD, are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between income and utilization of CVD-preventive services among U.S. adults.
: We included adults ≥18 years with and without CVD from the 2006 to 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We categorized participants as high-income (>400% of federal poverty level [FPL]), middle income (200-400% of FPL), low-income (125-200% of FPL) and very low (VL)-income (<125% of FPL). We used logistic regression to compare the likelihood of receiving CVD-preventive services by income strata, adjusting for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities.
: The study included 185,081 participants (representing 194.6 million U.S. adults) without CVD, and 32,862 participants (representing 37 million U.S. adults) with CVD. VL-income adults without CVD were less likely than high-income adults to have blood pressure measured within past 2 years [odds ratio [OR] 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.45)] or cholesterol levels checked within past 5 years [0.36 (0.33-0.38)] or receive counseling about diet modifications [0.77 (0.74-0.81)], exercise [0.81 (0.77-0.85)], or smoking cessation [0.71 (0.63-0.79)] within past year. VL-income adults with CVD were also less likely to have blood pressure [0.32 (0.22-0.46)] or cholesterol [0.33 (0.26-0.42)] checked and receive counseling about exercise [0.84 (0.76-0.93)] or smoking cessation [0.78 (0.61-0.99)]. Additional subgroup analyses restricted to participants who had seen a healthcare provider within the preceding 12 months, as well as secondary analyses stratified by sex, race and ethnicity, showed similar disparities between high-income and VL-income participants.
: VL-income adults were less likely to be screened for CVD risk factors or receive CVD-prevention counseling than high-income adults, regardless of CVD status. More work must be done to reduce disparities in access to and utilization of CVD-preventive services among adults in different income groups.
收入差距与心血管疾病(CVD)预防保健服务利用之间的关联,如在有无CVD的人群中接受生活方式建议和CVD危险因素筛查,目前尚未得到充分了解。本研究的目的是评估美国成年人收入与CVD预防服务利用之间的关联。
我们纳入了2006年至2015年医疗支出面板调查中年龄≥18岁、有无CVD的成年人。我们将参与者分为高收入(>联邦贫困水平[FPL]的400%)、中等收入(FPL的200 - 400%)、低收入(FPL的125 - 200%)和极低(VL)收入(<FPL的125%)。我们使用逻辑回归来比较不同收入阶层接受CVD预防服务的可能性,并对社会人口学因素和合并症进行了调整。
该研究纳入了185,081名无CVD的参与者(代表1.946亿美国成年人)和32,862名有CVD的参与者(代表3700万美国成年人)。无CVD的VL收入成年人在过去2年内测量血压的可能性低于高收入成年人[优势比(OR)0.41(95%置信区间[CI] 0.37 - 0.45)],或在过去5年内检查胆固醇水平的可能性低于高收入成年人[0.36(0.33 - 0.38)],或在过去1年内接受饮食调整咨询的可能性低于高收入成年人[0.77(0.74 - 0.81)]、运动咨询的可能性低于高收入成年人[0.81(0.77 - 0.85)]或戒烟咨询的可能性低于高收入成年人[0.71(0.63 - 0.79)]。有CVD的VL收入成年人检查血压[0.32(0.22 - 0.46)]或胆固醇[0.33(0.26 - 0.42)]以及接受运动咨询[0.84(0.76 - 0.93)]或戒烟咨询[0.78(0.61 - 0.99)]的可能性也低于高收入成年人。仅限于在过去12个月内看过医疗服务提供者的参与者的额外亚组分析,以及按性别、种族和民族分层的二次分析,显示高收入和VL收入参与者之间存在类似的差异。
无论CVD状态如何,VL收入成年人接受CVD危险因素筛查或接受CVD预防咨询的可能性均低于高收入成年人。必须开展更多工作以减少不同收入群体成年人在获得和利用CVD预防服务方面的差距。