Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany.
Heart. 2021 Feb;107(3):229-236. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317216. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
It is not fully understood whether and how socioeconomic status (SES) has a prognostic impact in patients with heart failure (HF). We assessed SES and its association with patient characteristics and outcomes in a contemporary and well-characterised HF cohort.
Socioeconomic risk factors (SERF) were defined in the Swedish HF Registry based on income (low vs high according to the annual median value), education level (no degree/compulsory school vs university/secondary school) and living arrangement (living alone vs cohabitating).
Of 44 631 patients, 21% had no, 33% one, 30% two and 16% three SERF. Patient characteristics strongly and independently associated with lower SES were female sex and no specialist referral. Additional independent associations were older age, more severe HF, heavier comorbidity burden, use of diuretics and less use of HF devices. Lower SES was associated with higher risk of HF hospitalisation/mortality, and overall cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular events. These associations persisted after extensive adjustment for patient characteristics, treatments and care. The magnitude of the association increased linearly with the increasing number of coexistent SERF: HR (95% CI) 1.09 (1.05 to 1.13) for one, 1.16 (1.12 to 1.20) for two and 1.22 (1.18 to 1.28) for three SERF (p<0.01).
In a contemporary and well-characterised HF cohort and after comprehensive adjustment for confounders, lower SES was linked with multiple factors such as less use of HF devices and age, but most strongly with female sex and lack of specialist referral; and associated with greater risk of morbidity/mortality.
目前尚不完全清楚社会经济地位(SES)是否以及如何对心力衰竭(HF)患者产生预后影响。我们评估了 SES 及其与当代特征明确的 HF 队列中患者特征和结局的相关性。
根据收入(年收入中位数的高低)、教育程度(无学位/义务教育与大学/中学)和居住安排(独居与同居),在瑞典 HF 登记处定义 SES 风险因素(SERF)。
在 44631 名患者中,21%没有、33%有一个、30%有两个和 16%有三个 SERF。与 SES 较低显著相关且独立的患者特征为女性和无专科转诊。其他独立的关联因素为年龄较大、HF 更严重、合并症负担更重、使用利尿剂和 HF 装置的使用较少。SES 较低与 HF 住院/死亡率以及总体心血管和非心血管事件的风险增加相关。这些关联在广泛调整患者特征、治疗和护理后仍然存在。SES 较低与共存 SERF 数量增加呈线性相关:存在一个 SERF 的 HR(95%CI)为 1.09(1.05 至 1.13)、两个 SERF 的 HR(95%CI)为 1.16(1.12 至 1.20)和三个 SERF 的 HR(95%CI)为 1.22(1.18 至 1.28)(p<0.01)。
在当代特征明确的 HF 队列中,经过全面调整混杂因素后,SES 较低与 HF 装置使用率低、年龄等多种因素有关,但与女性和缺乏专科转诊的关系最为密切;并与发病率/死亡率的增加相关。