Kim Christine, Erim Daniel, Natiq Kayhan, Salehi Ahmad Shah, Zeng Wu
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) Modeling and Advanced Analytics, Parexel International, Durham, NC, United States.
Front Glob Womens Health. 2020 Dec 8;1:571055. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2020.571055. eCollection 2020.
Giving birth with a skilled birth attendant at a facility that provides emergency obstetric care services has better outcomes, but many women do not have access to these services in low- and middle-income countries. Individual, household, and societal factors influence women's decisions about place of birth. Factors influencing birthplace preference by type of provider and level of public facility are not well understood. Applying the Andersen Behavioral Model of healthcare services use, we explored the association between characteristics of women and their choice of childbirth location using a multinomial logistic regression, and conducted a scenario analysis to predict changes in the childbirth location by imposing various interventions. Most women gave birth at home (68.1%), while 15.1% gave birth at a public clinic, 12.1% at a public hospital, and 4.7% at a private facility. Women with higher levels of education, from households in the upper two wealth quintiles, and who had any antenatal care were more likely to give birth in public or private facilities than at home. A combination of multisector interventions had the strongest signals from the model for increasing the predicted probability of in-facility childbirths. This study enhances our understanding of factors associated with the use of public facilities and the private sector for childbirth in Afghanistan. Policymakers and healthcare providers should seek to improve equity in the delivery of health services. This study highlights the need for decisionmakers to consider a combination of multisector efforts (e.g., health, education, and social protection), to increase equitable use of maternal healthcare services.
在提供紧急产科护理服务的机构中,由熟练的助产人员接生会有更好的结果,但在低收入和中等收入国家,许多妇女无法获得这些服务。个人、家庭和社会因素会影响妇女对分娩地点的决定。提供者类型和公共设施水平对分娩地点偏好的影响尚不清楚。应用医疗服务使用的安德森行为模型,我们使用多项逻辑回归探讨了妇女特征与其分娩地点选择之间的关联,并进行了情景分析,以预测通过实施各种干预措施分娩地点的变化。大多数妇女在家中分娩(68.1%),而15.1%在公共诊所分娩,12.1%在公立医院分娩,4.7%在私立机构分娩。教育水平较高、来自最富裕的两个财富五分位数家庭且接受过任何产前护理的妇女,在公共或私立机构分娩的可能性高于在家中分娩。多部门干预措施的组合在模型中对于提高设施内分娩预测概率具有最强的信号。这项研究增进了我们对阿富汗与使用公共设施和私营部门进行分娩相关因素的理解。政策制定者和医疗服务提供者应寻求改善卫生服务提供的公平性。这项研究强调决策者需要考虑多部门努力(如卫生、教育和社会保护)的组合,以增加孕产妇保健服务的公平使用。