Atrium Health Neurosciences Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine - Charlotte Campus, North Carolina, USA.
Neuromuscular Division, Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Muscle Nerve. 2022 Feb;65(2):180-186. doi: 10.1002/mus.27467. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
Phase 3 study MCI186-19 demonstrated less loss of physical function with edaravone versus placebo, as measured by the revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) total score. A 1-point drop in an individual ALSFRS-R item may be clinically meaningful. We assessed ALSFRS-R item score changes to identify clinical features protected by edaravone treatment.
Time-to-event analysis was used to assess the cumulative probabilities of reductions in ALSFRS-R item scores and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire (ALSAQ-40) subdomain scores.
Edaravone use was accompanied by: (1) delayed drop of ≥1 point in ALSFRS-R item score for four items: salivation, walking, climbing stairs, orthopnea (unadjusted), or for two items: walking, climbing stairs (after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons); (2) delayed score transition from 4 or 3 at baseline to ≤2 for five items: swallowing, eating motion, walking, climbing stairs, orthopnea (unadjusted), or for one item: climbing stairs (after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons); and (3) delayed worsening of ALSAQ-40 domain scores representing daily living/independence, eating and drinking (unadjusted).
These post-hoc analyses identified the ALSFRS-R item scores and ALSAQ-40 domain scores that were associated with preserved gross motor function and health-related quality of life, respectively, after edaravone treatment. Limitations of post-hoc analyses should be considered when interpreting these results. We recommend that clinical trials employing the ALSFRS-R include this type of analysis as a pre-specified secondary outcome measure.
第 3 阶段的 MCI186-19 研究表明,与安慰剂相比,依达拉奉组的身体功能丧失更少,这是通过修订后的肌萎缩侧索硬化功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R)总评分来衡量的。个体 ALSFRS-R 项目的 1 分下降可能具有临床意义。我们评估了 ALSFRS-R 项目评分的变化,以确定依达拉奉治疗所保护的临床特征。
使用时间事件分析来评估 ALSFRS-R 项目评分和肌萎缩侧索硬化评估问卷(ALSAQ-40)子域评分降低的累积概率。
依达拉奉的使用伴随着:(1)四项 ALSFRS-R 项目(流涎、行走、爬楼梯、端坐呼吸)或两项 ALSFRS-R 项目(行走、爬楼梯)的评分≥1 分下降的时间延迟(未校正),或两项 ALSFRS-R 项目(行走、爬楼梯)的评分≥1 分下降的时间延迟(经 Bonferroni 校正多重比较);(2)五项 ALSFRS-R 项目(吞咽、进食动作、行走、爬楼梯、端坐呼吸)或一项 ALSFRS-R 项目(爬楼梯)从基线时的 4 或 3 分降至≤2 分的评分转变延迟(未校正),或一项 ALSFRS-R 项目(爬楼梯)从基线时的 4 或 3 分降至≤2 分的评分转变延迟(经 Bonferroni 校正多重比较);(3)ALSAQ-40 代表日常生活/独立性、进食和饮水的域评分恶化延迟(未校正)。
这些事后分析确定了与依达拉奉治疗后保留粗大运动功能和健康相关生活质量分别相关的 ALSFRS-R 项目评分和 ALSAQ-40 域评分。在解释这些结果时,应考虑事后分析的局限性。我们建议采用 ALSFRS-R 的临床试验将这种类型的分析作为预先指定的次要终点纳入。