Li Guoliang, Yao Ying, Lü Shengyao, Xie Yaoming, Douberly Gary E, Schaefer Henry F
Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, Ministry of Education; Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, School of Chemistry, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510006, P. R. China.
Department of Chemistry and Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2021 Dec 8;23(47):26837-26842. doi: 10.1039/d1cp04309a.
Four different reaction pathways are initially located for the reaction of Cl atom plus water trimer Cl + (HO) → HCl + (HO)OH using a standard DFT method. As found for the analogous fluorine reaction, the geometrical and energetic results for the four chlorine pathways are closely related. However, the energetics for the Cl reaction are very different from those for fluorine. In the present paper, we investigate the lowest-energy chlorine pathway using the "gold standard" CCSD(T) method in conjunction with correlation-consistent basis sets up to cc-pVQZ. Structurally, the stationary points for the water trimer reaction Cl + (HO) may be compared to those for the water monomer reaction Cl + HO and water dimer reaction Cl + (HO). Based on the CCSD(T) energies, the title reaction is endothermic by 19.3 kcal mol, with a classical barrier height of 16.7 kcal mol between the reactants and the exit complex. There is no barrier for the reverse reaction. The Cl⋯(HO) entrance complex lies 5.3 kcal mol below the separated reactants. The HCl⋯(HO)OH exit complex is bound by 8.6 kcal mol relative to the separated products. The Cl + (HO) reaction is somewhat similar to the analogous Cl + (HO) reaction, but qualitatively different from the Cl + HO reaction. It is reasonable to expect that the reactions between the chlorine atom and larger water clusters may be similar to the Cl + (HO) reaction. The potential energy profile for the Cl + (HO) reaction is radically different from that for the valence isoelectronic F + (HO) system, which may be related to the different bond energies between HCl and HF.
使用标准密度泛函理论(DFT)方法,最初为氯原子与三聚水分子反应Cl + (HO)₃ → HCl + (HO)₂OH确定了四种不同的反应途径。正如在类似的氟反应中所发现的那样,四条氯反应途径的几何结构和能量结果密切相关。然而,氯反应的能量学与氟反应的能量学非常不同。在本文中,我们使用“金标准”耦合簇单双激发(CCSD(T))方法并结合高达cc-pVQZ的相关一致基组,研究了能量最低的氯反应途径。在结构上,三聚水分子反应Cl + (HO)₃的驻点可以与单聚水分子反应Cl + HO以及二聚水分子反应Cl + (HO)₂的驻点进行比较。基于CCSD(T)能量,该标题反应吸热19.3千卡/摩尔,反应物与出口复合物之间的经典势垒高度为16.7千卡/摩尔。逆反应没有势垒。Cl⋯(HO)₃入口复合物比分离的反应物低5.3千卡/摩尔。HCl⋯(HO)₂OH出口复合物相对于分离的产物结合能为8.6千卡/摩尔。Cl + (HO)₃反应在某种程度上类似于类似的Cl + (HO)₂反应,但与Cl + HO反应在性质上不同。可以合理预期氯原子与更大的水分子团簇之间的反应可能类似于Cl + (HO)₂反应。Cl + (HO)₃反应的势能面与价电子等电子体F + (HO)₂体系的势能面截然不同,这可能与HCl和HF之间不同的键能有关。