Suppr超能文献

中空微针给药与肌肉注射相比纳洛酮和纳美芬的吸收。

Naloxone and nalmefene absorption delivered by hollow microneedles compared to intramuscular injection.

机构信息

College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA.

College of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

出版信息

Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022 Feb;12(2):376-383. doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-01096-0. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

Abstract

Naloxone and nalmefene were administered to seven research beagle dogs (mean weight approximately 12 kg) at doses of 0.04 mg/kg and 0.014 mg/kg for naloxone and nalmefene, respectively. Each dose was administered intramuscularly (IM) with a standard IM injection and with a hollow microneedle device array using needles of 1 mm in length. The IM injection was delivered in the epaxial muscles, and the microneedle injection was delivered in the skin over the shoulder of each dog. Each dog received the same injections in a crossover design. Following the injection, blood samples were collected for plasma analysis of naloxone and nalmefene by high-pressure liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry detection (LCMS). The plasma sample concentrations were plotted for observed patterns of absorption and analyzed with non-compartmental pharmacokinetic methods (NCA). The results showed that the injection of naloxone from the microneedle device produced a higher peak concentration (C) by 2.15 × compared the IM injection of the same dose, and time to peak concentration (T) was similar. For the nalmefene injection, the peak was not as high (lower C) by 0.94 × for the microneedle injection compared to the IM injection of the same dose. The microneedle produced an exposure, measured by area under the curve (AUC), that was 0.85 × and 0.58 × as high for naloxone and nalmefene, respectively, than the injection by the IM route. We also observed that although the dose for naloxone was approximately 3 × higher for naloxone compared to nalmefene, the mean peak concentration achieved from the naloxone injection was more than 12 × higher than that from the nalmefene injection. These studies were designed to test the feasibility of using the hollow microneedle array as an effective method of naloxone and nalmefene delivery for emergency treatment of opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD). The results of these studies will form the basis of future studies, using the dog as a model, for development of hollow microneedle microarray devices to deliver opioid antagonists for treatment of OIRD in people.

摘要

纳洛酮和纳美芬分别以 0.04mg/kg 和 0.014mg/kg 的剂量给 7 只研究用比格犬(平均体重约 12kg)肌肉注射。 每种剂量均采用标准肌内(IM)注射和带有 1mm 长的空心微针装置进行肌内注射。IM 注射在背侧肌肉中进行,微针注射在每只狗肩部的皮肤下进行。每只狗均以交叉设计接受相同的注射。 注射后,通过高效液相色谱-质谱联用(LCMS)法采集血样,分析纳洛酮和纳美芬的血浆浓度。 绘制血浆样本浓度,采用非房室药代动力学方法(NCA)进行分析。结果表明,与相同剂量的 IM 注射相比,微针装置注射纳洛酮可使 Cmax 增加 2.15 倍,Tmax 相似。对于纳美芬注射,微针注射的峰值(C)比相同剂量的 IM 注射低 0.94 倍。 微针给药的 AUC 分别是纳洛酮和纳美芬的 0.85 倍和 0.58 倍。 我们还观察到,虽然纳洛酮的剂量约为纳美芬的 3 倍,但纳洛酮注射的平均峰值浓度仍比纳美芬注射高 12 倍以上。 这些研究旨在测试空心微针阵列作为阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制(OIRD)紧急治疗中纳洛酮和纳美芬给药的有效方法的可行性。 这些研究的结果将为未来的研究提供基础,使用狗作为模型,开发用于治疗 OIRD 的空心微针微阵列装置,以提供阿片类拮抗剂。

相似文献

10
Lipophilic nalmefene prodrugs to achieve a one-month sustained release.亲脂性纳美芬前药实现一个月的持续释放。
J Control Release. 2016 Jun 28;232:196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

2
Countermeasures for Preventing and Treating Opioid Overdose.阿片类药物过量预防和治疗的对策。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;109(3):578-590. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2098. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
5
Management of opioid analgesic overdose.阿片类镇痛药过量的管理。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 12;367(2):146-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1202561.
8
Indirect rapid prototyping of antibacterial acid anhydride copolymer microneedles.抗菌酸酐共聚物微针的间接快速成型。
Biofabrication. 2012 Mar;4(1):011002. doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/4/1/011002. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验