Sociology and Social Policy Programme, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Jan;44(1):99-112. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13401. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
Homeopathy, along with many other alternative therapies, has come under severe attack from apologists for orthodox medicine. Given the cultural authority of medicine, what then provides the impetus for people to take up homeopathy as a clinical practice? This article addresses this question in the context of homeopathic practice in New Zealand. Five focus groups were conducted with 22 homeopaths in five cities. The study found that it was common to be drawn to homeopathy through witnessing in themselves, their family, friends or animals, the positive effects of homeopathy, commonly after negligible success from conventional medicine. For many participants, all of whom were women, the opportunity to study homeopathy occurred when they were the primary carers of children, with homeopathy providing a possibility for a change in work trajectories. Many participants had previous occupations inside the conventional health system. Central to the appeal of homeopathy as a subaltern practice in New Zealand is the often dramatic impact of witnessing the effects of the therapeutic modality, which is conceptualised as analogous to an 'event' that tears at the fabric of the everyday.
顺势疗法与许多其他替代疗法一样,受到正统医学辩护者的严厉抨击。鉴于医学的文化权威,那么是什么促使人们将顺势疗法作为一种临床实践呢?本文在新西兰顺势疗法实践的背景下探讨了这个问题。研究在五个城市对 22 名顺势疗师进行了五次焦点小组讨论。研究发现,人们通常会因为自己、家人、朋友或动物亲身经历到顺势疗法的积极效果而被吸引,通常是在传统医学收效甚微之后。对于许多参与者来说,他们都是女性,当她们成为孩子的主要照顾者时,就有机会学习顺势疗法,顺势疗法为工作轨迹的改变提供了可能性。许多参与者之前都在传统医疗体系中有过职业经历。作为新西兰的一种底层实践,顺势疗法的吸引力在于,人们常常会因为亲眼目睹治疗模式的效果而感到震撼,这种效果被概念化为类似于一种“事件”,它撕裂了日常生活的结构。