Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, F-75005 Paris, France.
AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Armand-Trousseau, Service de Pneumologie Pédiatrique, F-75012 Paris, France.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2022 Jan 1;132(1):95-105. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00994.2020. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
In healthy humans, inspiratory threshold loading deteriorates cognitive performances. This can result from motor-cognitive interference (activation of motor respiratory-related cortical networks vs. executive resources allocation), sensory-cognitive interference (dyspnea vs. shift in attentional focus), or both. We hypothesized that inspiratory loading would concomitantly induce dyspnea, activate motor respiratory-related cortical networks, and deteriorate cognitive performance. We reasoned that a concomitant activation of cortical networks and cognitive deterioration would be compatible with motor-cognitive interference, particularly in case of a predominant alteration of executive cognitive performances. Symmetrically, we reasoned that a predominant alteration of attention-depending performances would suggest sensory-cognitive interference. Twenty-five volunteers (12 men; 19.5-51.5 yr) performed the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-A and B; calculation capacity, working memory, attention), the Trail Making Test (TMT-A, visuospatial exploration capacity; TMT-B, visuospatial exploration capacity, and attention), and the Corsi block-tapping test (visuospatial memory, short-term, and working memory) during unloaded breathing and inspiratory threshold loading in random order. Loading consistently induced dyspnea and respiratory-related brain activation. It was associated with deteriorations in PASAT-A [52 [45.5;55.5]; (median [interquartile range]) to 48 [41;54.5], = 0.01], PASAT-B (55 [47.5;58] to 51 [44.5;57.5], = 0.01), and TMT-B (44 s [36;54.5] to 53 s [42;64], = 0.01), but did not affect TMT-A and Corsi. The concomitance of cortical activation and cognitive performance deterioration is compatible with competition for cortical resources (motor-cognitive interference), whereas the profile of cognitive impairment (PASAT and TMT-B but not TMT-A and Corsi) is compatible with a contribution of attentional distraction (sensory-cognitive interference). Both mechanisms are therefore likely at play. To our knowledge, this is the first study exploring the interferences between inspiratory loading and cognition in healthy subjects with the concomitant use of neuropsychological tests and electroencephalographic recordings. Inspiratory loading was associated with dyspnea, respiratory-related changes in brain activation, and a pattern of deterioration of neuropsychological tests suggestive of attentional disruption. Inspiratory loading is therefore likely to impact cognitive performances through both motor-cognitive interference (engagement of cortical networks) and sensory-cognitive interference (dyspnea-related shift in attentional focus).
在健康人群中,吸气阈负荷会降低认知表现。这可能是由于运动认知干扰(呼吸相关运动皮质网络的激活与执行资源分配)、感觉认知干扰(呼吸困难与注意力转移)或两者共同作用的结果。我们假设吸气负荷会同时引起呼吸困难,激活呼吸相关的皮质网络,并降低认知表现。我们推断,皮质网络的同时激活和认知能力下降与运动认知干扰是一致的,特别是在执行认知表现主要改变的情况下。同样地,我们推断,主要改变依赖注意力的表现则提示感觉认知干扰。25 名志愿者(12 名男性;19.5-51.5 岁)在随机顺序下进行了未加载呼吸和吸气阈负荷时的 Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test(PASAT-A 和 B;计算能力、工作记忆、注意力)、Trail Making Test(TMT-A,视空间探索能力;TMT-B,视空间探索能力和注意力)和 Corsi 方块-tapping 测试(视空间记忆、短期和工作记忆)。负荷始终引起呼吸困难和呼吸相关的大脑激活。它与 PASAT-A 的恶化相关[52 [45.5;55.5];(中位数[四分位距])降至 48 [41;54.5], = 0.01]、PASAT-B(55 [47.5;58]至 51 [44.5;57.5], = 0.01)和 TMT-B(44 秒[36;54.5]至 53 秒[42;64], = 0.01),但不影响 TMT-A 和 Corsi。皮质激活和认知表现恶化的同时发生与皮质资源竞争(运动认知干扰)一致,而认知障碍的表现(PASAT 和 TMT-B,但不是 TMT-A 和 Corsi)与注意力分散的贡献一致(感觉认知干扰)。因此,这两种机制都可能在起作用。据我们所知,这是第一项使用神经心理学测试和脑电图记录同时研究吸气负荷与健康受试者认知之间干扰的研究。吸气负荷与呼吸困难、与呼吸相关的大脑激活变化以及神经心理学测试恶化的模式有关,提示注意力分散。因此,吸气负荷可能通过运动认知干扰(皮质网络的参与)和感觉认知干扰(与呼吸困难相关的注意力转移)来影响认知表现。