Rassam Peter, de Mori Tamires, Van Hollebeke Marine, Rozenberg Dmitry, Davenport Paul, Vallis Lori Ann, Reid W Darlene
Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
ERJ Open Res. 2024 Oct 7;10(5). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00169-2024. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Inspiratory threshold loading (ITL) and associated dyspnoea have been shown to interfere with cognition during cognitive-motor dual tasking. However, ITL has not been compared with another rhythmic muscle activity, such as lower limb pedalling. While ITL has been shown to interfere with cognition, the mechanism of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) during ITL or other rhythmical muscle dual tasking, has not been elucidated. Given the cognitive interference that arises during ITL, we hypothesise that ITL cognitive-motor dual tasking will result in greater cognitive decrements and increased PFC activity compared with the pedalling cognitive-motor dual task.
30 healthy participants (16 females; median age 23 (interquartile range 23-24) years) were recruited. They performed five 3-min tasks in a single visit in a random order: single tasks were ITL, pedalling and Stroop task and dual tasks were ITL-Stroop and pedalling-Stroop. Participant's PFC activity was assessed bilaterally using functional near-infrared spectroscopy throughout each task. Single- and dual-task cognitive performance was evaluated by measuring Stroop task reaction time and accuracy. Dyspnoea and rating of perceived exertion were evaluated at the end of each task.
ITL-Stroop resulted in greater impairments in reaction time (p<0.001), accuracy (p<0.01) and increased medial/dorsolateral PFC activity (p≤0.006) than pedalling-Stroop. ITL-Stroop elicited greater Borg dyspnoea and rating of perceived exertion than pedalling-Stroop (p<0.001), despite pedalling-Stroop having a greater heart rate response (p<0.001).
The heightened cognitive decrements, perceptual response and PFC activity suggest that inspiratory muscle loading and its accompanied dyspnoea results in greater cognitive interference than rhythmic pedalling.
吸气阈负荷(ITL)及相关呼吸困难已被证明在认知-运动双重任务期间会干扰认知。然而,ITL尚未与另一种有节奏的肌肉活动(例如下肢蹬踏)进行比较。虽然ITL已被证明会干扰认知,但在ITL或其他有节奏的肌肉双重任务期间前额叶皮质(PFC)的机制尚未阐明。鉴于ITL期间出现的认知干扰,我们假设与蹬踏认知-运动双重任务相比,ITL认知-运动双重任务将导致更大的认知能力下降和PFC活动增加。
招募了30名健康参与者(16名女性;年龄中位数23岁(四分位间距23 - 24岁))。他们在一次就诊中以随机顺序进行了五项3分钟的任务:单任务为ITL、蹬踏和斯特鲁普任务,双任务为ITL-斯特鲁普和蹬踏-斯特鲁普。在每个任务期间,使用功能近红外光谱法双侧评估参与者的PFC活动。通过测量斯特鲁普任务反应时间和准确性来评估单任务和双任务的认知表现。在每个任务结束时评估呼吸困难和主观用力程度评级。
与蹬踏-斯特鲁普相比,ITL-斯特鲁普在反应时间(p<0.001)、准确性(p<0.01)方面有更大损伤,内侧/背外侧PFC活动增加(p≤0.006)。尽管蹬踏-斯特鲁普有更大的心率反应(p<0.001),但ITL-斯特鲁普比蹬踏-斯特鲁普引发了更大的博格呼吸困难和主观用力程度评级(p<0.001)。
认知能力下降加剧、感知反应和PFC活动增加表明,吸气肌负荷及其伴随的呼吸困难比有节奏的蹬踏导致更大的认知干扰。