Center for Pharmacy Practice Innovation, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, Richmond.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Dec;27(12):1680-1690. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.12.1680.
Hypertension is highly prevalent in the United States, affecting nearly half of all adults (43%). Studies have shown that pharmacist-physician collaborative care models (PPCCMs) for hypertension management significantly improve blood pressure (BP) control rates and provide consistent control of BP. Time in target range (TTR) for systolic BP is a novel measure of BP control consistency that is independently associated with decreased cardiovascular risk. There is no evidence that observed improvement in TTR for systolic BP with a PPCCM is cost-effective. To compare the cost-effectiveness of a PPCCM with usual care for the management of hypertension from the payer perspective. We used a decision analytic model with a 3-year time horizon based on published literature and publicly available data. The population consisted of adult patients who had a previous diagnosis of high BP (defined as office-based BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg) or were receiving antihypertensive medications. Effectiveness data were drawn from 2 published studies evaluating the effect of PPCCMs (vs usual care) on TTR for systolic BP and the impact of TTR for systolic BP on 4 cardiovascular outcomes (nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, heart failure [HF], and cardiovascular disease [CVD] death). The model incorporated direct medical costs, including both programmatic costs (ie, direct costs for provider time) and downstream health care utilization associated with acute cardiovascular events. One-way sensitivity and threshold analyses examined model robustness. In base-case analyses, PPCCM hypertension management was associated with lower downstream medical expenditures (difference: -$162.86) and lower total program costs (difference: -$108.00) when compared with usual care. PPCCM was associated with lower downstream medical expenditures across all parameter ranges tested in the deterministic sensitivity analysis. For every 10,000 hypertension patients managed with PPCCM vs usual care over a 3-year time horizon, approximately 27 CVD deaths, 29 strokes, 21 nonfatal MIs, and 12 incident HF diagnoses are expected to be averted. This is the first study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PPCCM compared to usual care on TTR for systolic BP in adults with hypertension. PPCCM was less costly to administer and resulted in downstream health care savings and fewer acute cardiovascular events relative to usual care. Although further research is needed to evaluate the long-term costs and outcomes of PPCCM, payer coverage of PPCCM services may prevent future health care costs and improve patient cardiovascular outcomes. : No funding was received for the completion of this research. The authors have nothing to disclose. Study results were presented as an abstract at the AMCP 2021 Virtual, April 12-16, 2021.
高血压在美国的发病率很高,几乎影响了一半的成年人(43%)。研究表明,高血压管理的药师-医师协作护理模式(PPCCM)可显著提高血压(BP)控制率,并保持 BP 的持续控制。收缩压的目标范围内时间(TTR)是 BP 控制一致性的新指标,与心血管风险降低独立相关。没有证据表明,PPCCM 可改善收缩压 TTR,且具有成本效益。 从支付者的角度比较高血压管理中使用 PPCCM 与常规护理的成本效益。 我们使用了一个基于已发表文献和公开数据的具有 3 年时间范围的决策分析模型。该人群包括患有高血压(定义为基于办公室的 BP≥140/90mmHg)或正在接受抗高血压药物治疗的成年患者。效果数据来自 2 项评估 PPCCM(与常规护理相比)对收缩压 TTR 的影响以及收缩压 TTR 对 4 种心血管结局(非致死性心肌梗死[MI]、中风、心力衰竭[HF]和心血管疾病[CVD]死亡)影响的研究。该模型纳入了直接医疗成本,包括计划成本(即提供者时间的直接成本)和与急性心血管事件相关的下游医疗保健利用。单因素敏感性和阈值分析检查了模型的稳健性。 在基线分析中,与常规护理相比,PPCCM 高血压管理与较低的下游医疗支出(差异:-162.86 美元)和较低的总计划成本(差异:-108.00 美元)相关。在确定性敏感性分析中,在测试的所有参数范围内,PPCCM 与较低的下游医疗支出相关。与 3 年内使用常规护理相比,每 10000 名高血压患者使用 PPCCM 管理,预计可预防约 27 例 CVD 死亡、29 例中风、21 例非致死性 MI 和 12 例新发 HF 诊断。 这是第一项评估与常规护理相比,PPCCM 在收缩压 TTR 方面对高血压成人患者的成本效益的研究。与常规护理相比,PPCCM 的管理成本更低,并且与常规护理相比,可节省下游医疗保健费用,并减少急性心血管事件。尽管需要进一步研究来评估 PPCCM 的长期成本和结果,但支付者对 PPCCM 服务的覆盖可能会防止未来的医疗保健费用,并改善患者的心血管结果。 这项研究没有获得完成该研究的资金。作者没有要披露的内容。研究结果作为摘要在 2021 年 4 月 12 日至 16 日举行的 AMCP 2021 虚拟会议上公布。