Suppr超能文献

脓毒症和急性呼吸衰竭患者 ICU 入住与结局的相关性。

Association of ICU Admission and Outcomes in Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Failure.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care.

Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, and.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;205(5):520-528. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202106-1350OC.

Abstract

Many decisions to admit patients to the ICU are not grounded in evidence regarding who benefits from such triage, straining ICU capacity and limiting its cost-effectiveness. To measure the benefits of ICU admission for patients with sepsis or acute respiratory failure. At 27 United States hospitals across two health systems from 2013 to 2018, we performed a retrospective cohort study using two-stage instrumental variable quantile regression with a strong instrument (hospital capacity strain) governing ICU versus ward admission among high-acuity patients (i.e., laboratory-based acute physiology score v2 ⩾ 100) with sepsis and/or acute respiratory failure who did not require mechanical ventilation or vasopressors in the emergency department. Among patients with sepsis ( = 90,150), admission to the ICU was associated with a 1.32-day longer hospital length of stay (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.63;  < 0.001) (when treating deaths as equivalent to long lengths of stay) and higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.13-1.88;  = 0.004). Among patients with respiratory failure ( = 45,339), admission to the ICU was associated with a 0.82-day shorter hospital length of stay (95% CI, -1.17 to -0.46;  < 0.001) and reduced in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.96;  = 0.04). In sensitivity analyses of length of stay, excluding, ignoring, or censoring death, results were similar in sepsis but not in respiratory failure. In subgroup analyses, harms of ICU admission for patients with sepsis were concentrated among older patients and those with fewer comorbidities, and the benefits of ICU admission for patients with respiratory failure were concentrated among older patients, highest-acuity patients, and those with more comorbidities. Among high-acuity patients with sepsis who did not require life support in the emergency department, initial admission to the ward, compared with the ICU, was associated with shorter length of stay and improved survival, whereas among patients with acute respiratory failure, triage to the ICU compared with the ward was associated with improved survival.

摘要

许多将患者收入 ICU 的决策并非基于谁能从这种分诊中受益的证据,这给 ICU 的容量带来了压力,并限制了其成本效益。为了衡量 ICU 对脓毒症或急性呼吸衰竭患者的益处。在 2013 年至 2018 年期间,我们在两个医疗系统的 27 家美国医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用两阶段工具变量分位数回归和一个强有力的工具(医院容量紧张)来管理高风险患者(即基于实验室的急性生理学评分 v2≥100)的 ICU 与病房入院之间的关系,这些患者患有脓毒症和/或急性呼吸衰竭,但在急诊科不需要机械通气或血管加压药。在患有脓毒症的患者中( = 90,150),入住 ICU 与住院时间延长 1.32 天相关(95%置信区间 [CI],1.01-1.63; < 0.001)(将死亡视为与长时间住院等效),院内死亡率更高(比值比,1.48;95%CI,1.13-1.88; = 0.004)。在患有呼吸衰竭的患者中( = 45,339),入住 ICU 与住院时间缩短 0.82 天相关(95%CI,-1.17 至-0.46; < 0.001),院内死亡率降低(比值比,0.75;95%CI,0.57-0.96; = 0.04)。在住院时间的敏感性分析中,排除、忽略或 censored 死亡,结果在脓毒症中相似,但在呼吸衰竭中则不然。在亚组分析中,脓毒症患者 ICU 入院的危害集中在年龄较大和合并症较少的患者中,而呼吸衰竭患者 ICU 入院的益处集中在年龄较大、病情最严重和合并症较多的患者中。在急诊科不需要生命支持的高风险脓毒症患者中,与 ICU 相比,初始入住病房与住院时间缩短和生存率提高相关,而在急性呼吸衰竭患者中,与病房相比,分诊到 ICU 与生存率提高相关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Emergency department boarding: The canary in the coal mine.急诊科滞留:煤矿里的金丝雀。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Oct 23;2(1):e12290. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12290. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
The Quality of End-of-Life Care among ICU versus Ward Decedents.ICU 与非 ICU 临终患者的临终关怀质量比较。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):832-839. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201907-1423OC.
10
Understanding irresponsible use of intensive care unit resources in the USA.了解美国重症监护病房资源的滥用情况。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Jul;7(7):605-612. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30088-8. Epub 2019 May 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验