Suppr超能文献

便携式即时检测方法测量胆红素和经皮胆红素计的诊断性能。

Diagnostic Properties of a Portable Point-of-Care Method to Measure Bilirubin and a Transcutaneous Bilirubinometer.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neonatology. 2021;118(6):678-684. doi: 10.1159/000518653. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, the Bilistick®, a point-of-care instrument to measure bilirubin levels, has been developed. It is fast and cheaper than transcutaneous bilirubin (TCB)-measuring devices, but data on diagnostic properties are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the performance of the Bilistick® (BM-BS 1.0 - FW version 2.0.1) and the JM-105 bilirubinometer for measuring bilirubin.

METHOD

This is a prospective study in infants born after ≥32 weeks' gestation, and/or a birth weight of ≥1,500 g, and a postnatal age ≤14 days in Surabaya, Indonesia. Bilirubin was measured with the Bilistick® System (BM-BS 1.0 - FW version 2.0.1), transcutaneously (TCB) with the JM-105 bilirubinometer, and in serum (TSB) with a routine laboratory technique. Mean differences and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) and correlations were calculated.

RESULT

We enrolled 149 neonates and 126 had paired measurements of Bilistick® bilirubin, TCB, and TSB. Bilistick® failed in 16 (10.7%) infants. Mean Bilistick® bilirubin-TSB difference was -11 µmol/L (95% LOA: -101 to 79 µmol/L) and r = 0.738 (p < 0.001). Mean TCB-TSB difference was 26 μmol/L (95% LOA: -33 to 88) and r = 0.785 (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for Bilistick® bilirubin for a TSB above treatment thresholds were 0.74, 0.84, 0.67, and 0.88, respectively, and for TCB 0.92, 0.64, 0.54, and 0.95, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Bilistick® System (BM-BS 1.0 - FW version 2.0.1) underestimates TSB, whereas TCB overestimates TSB in jaundiced Indonesian infants. Further improvement of Bilistick®'s diagnostic accuracy with less false-negative readings is essential to increase its use.

摘要

背景

最近,一种名为 Bilistick®的即时检测仪器已经被开发出来,可以用于测量胆红素水平。与经皮胆红素(TCB)测量设备相比,它更快、更便宜,但关于其诊断性能的数据却很少。

目的

本研究旨在比较 Bilistick®(BM-BS 1.0-FW 版本 2.0.1)和 JM-105 胆红素计测量胆红素的性能。

方法

这是一项在印度尼西亚泗水进行的前瞻性研究,纳入胎龄≥32 周、出生体重≥1500g、出生后年龄≤14 天的婴儿。使用 Bilistick®系统(BM-BS 1.0-FW 版本 2.0.1)经皮(TCB)测量 JM-105 胆红素计和血清(TSB)胆红素。计算平均差异和 95%的一致性界限(LOA)和相关性。

结果

我们共纳入了 149 名新生儿,其中 126 名有 Bilistick®胆红素、TCB 和 TSB 的配对测量值。16 名(10.7%)婴儿的 Bilistick®失败。Bilisitck®与 TSB 的胆红素平均差异为-11μmol/L(95% LOA:-101 至 79μmol/L),r=0.738(p<0.001)。TCB-TSB 的平均差异为 26μmol/L(95% LOA:-33 至 88),r=0.785(p<0.001)。Bilisitck®胆红素用于 TSB 治疗阈值以上的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 0.74、0.84、0.67 和 0.88,TCB 分别为 0.92、0.64、0.54 和 0.95。

结论

Bilisitck®系统(BM-BS 1.0-FW 版本 2.0.1)低估了 TSB,而 TCB 则高估了印度尼西亚黄疸婴儿的 TSB。进一步提高 Bilistick®的诊断准确性,减少假阴性读数,对于增加其使用至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验