Charles Sturt University, Australia.
The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Health (London). 2023 Jul;27(4):588-606. doi: 10.1177/13634593211060763. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
Despite high unmet demand for health services across rural Australia, uptake of telehealth has been slow, piecemeal and ad hoc. We argue that widespread failure to understand telehealth as a socio-technical practice is key to understanding this slow progress. To develop this argument, we explore how technocentric approaches to telehealth have contributed to critical blind spots. First, the 'hype' associated with the technological possibilities of telehealth discourages thoughtful consideration of the unanticipated consequences when technologies are rolled out into complex social fields. Second, it contributes to critical gaps in the telehealth evidence base, and particularly a paucity of analyses focussing on the experiences of service users and patients. A third blind spot concerns the limited attention paid to the social determinants of health and digital divides in rural areas. The final blind spot we consider is an apparent reluctance to engage community stakeholders in co-designing and coproducing telehealth services. We used an iterative approach to identify studies and commentary from a range of academic fields to explain the significance of the telehealth blind spots and how they might be addressed. Insights suggest how expanding understanding of the social dimensions of telehealth could enhance its accessibility, effectiveness and responsiveness to community needs and contexts.
尽管澳大利亚农村地区对医疗服务有很高的未满足需求,但远程医疗的采用一直缓慢、零碎且临时。我们认为,未能广泛将远程医疗理解为一种社会技术实践是理解这一缓慢进展的关键。为了发展这一论点,我们探讨了技术中心主义的远程医疗方法如何导致了关键的盲点。首先,远程医疗技术可能性带来的“炒作”阻碍了人们在技术引入复杂的社会领域时,对意料之外的后果进行深思熟虑的考虑。其次,这导致了远程医疗证据基础中的关键差距,特别是缺乏关注服务用户和患者体验的分析。第三个盲点涉及对农村地区健康的社会决定因素和数字鸿沟的关注有限。我们考虑的最后一个盲点是,似乎不愿意让社区利益相关者参与远程医疗服务的共同设计和共同生产。我们采用迭代方法,从多个学术领域中识别研究和评论,以解释远程医疗盲点的意义,以及如何解决这些盲点。这些见解表明,扩大对远程医疗社会层面的理解如何增强其可及性、有效性和对社区需求和背景的响应能力。