Toll Kaylie, Robinson Suzanne, Andrew Stephen, Williams Aled, Yeung Justin, Varhol Richard, Moullin Joanna C
School of Population Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Bentley, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12335-2.
Rural provider-to-provider telehealth is growing globally. It is used to both facilitate equitable access to specialist healthcare services for those living in rural and remote areas and provide support to place-based providers. There is limited research on the implementation of these services, especially in an emergency or inpatient hospital setting. The Western Australia Country Health Service (WACHS) Command Centre is one such example. First implemented in 2012, the Command Centre services a geographical area covering 2.55 million square kilometres, a population of approximately 550,000, and provides five clinical streams including Emergency, Mental Health Emergency, Midwifery and Obstetrics Emergency, Inpatient, and Palliative Care Afterhours Telehealth Services.
This study aimed to evaluate the implementation and access of rural provider-to-provider telehealth in country Western Australia, for the years 2012 to 2023.
A retrospective observational analysis was conducted of all patient contacts managed by clinical telehealth streams of the Command Centre, between 31 August 2012 and 31 December 2023. Utilising descriptive statistics, analyses was informed by the expanded Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) Framework and Implementation Outcomes Framework (IOF) definitions.
Over the near 12-year period, a total of 215,965 service contacts were analysed from the five Command Centre clinical streams. There was large variation in the reach and adoption of services across regions, sites, and health facility types, however service scope and activity has increased steadily over time (maintenance). 95 of the 103 WACHS-managed sites had utilised Command Centre clinical telehealth services. The Command Centre has seen an increase in the proportion of clinical telehealth services provided to the most disadvantaged populations, demonstrating improved equity of access (effectiveness) over time.
There is a steady expansion in the availability of provider-to-provider clinical telehealth services delivered by the WACHS Command Centre across country WA, but with wide variability of usage depending on region, site, and health facility type. The results of this study show there is a need to understand the contextual factors influencing the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of the service.
农村医疗服务提供者之间的远程医疗在全球范围内不断发展。它既用于促进农村和偏远地区居民公平获得专科医疗服务,也用于为当地医疗服务提供者提供支持。关于这些服务实施情况的研究有限,尤其是在急诊或住院医院环境中。西澳大利亚乡村卫生服务局(WACHS)指挥中心就是这样一个例子。该指挥中心于2012年首次启用,服务覆盖面积达255万平方公里,人口约55万,并提供包括急诊、心理健康急诊、助产和产科急诊、住院以及姑息治疗非工作时间远程医疗服务在内的五个临床服务类别。
本研究旨在评估2012年至2023年期间西澳大利亚乡村地区医疗服务提供者之间远程医疗的实施情况和可及性。
对指挥中心临床远程医疗服务类别在2012年8月31日至2023年12月31日期间管理的所有患者接触情况进行回顾性观察分析。利用描述性统计方法,依据扩展的覆盖范围、有效性、采用情况、实施情况、维持情况(RE-AIM)框架和实施结果框架(IOF)定义进行分析。
在近12年期间,共对指挥中心五个临床服务类别的215,965次服务接触进行了分析。各地区、站点和卫生设施类型在服务覆盖范围和采用情况方面存在很大差异,但服务范围和活动随时间稳步增加(维持情况)。WACHS管理的103个站点中有95个使用了指挥中心的临床远程医疗服务。指挥中心向最弱势群体提供的临床远程医疗服务比例有所增加,表明随着时间推移可及性公平性得到改善(有效性)。
WACHS指挥中心在西澳大利亚乡村地区提供的医疗服务提供者之间的临床远程医疗服务可用性稳步扩大,但使用情况因地区、站点和卫生设施类型而异。本研究结果表明,有必要了解影响该服务采用、实施和可持续性的背景因素。