• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用“大声思考”方法对药学专业本科生临床推理能力的培养与评估——一项混合方法研究

Development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using 'think aloud' approach in pharmacy undergraduates - A mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Altalhi Faisal, Altalhi Abdulrhman, Magliah Ziad, Abushal Zaid, Althaqafi Anas, Falemban Azzam, Cheema Ejaz, Dehele Inderpal, Ali Majid

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

School of Pharmacy, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

Saudi Pharm J. 2021 Nov;29(11):1250-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsps.2021.10.003
PMID:34819786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8596158/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Given the widespread use of clinical reasoning (CR) in the healthcare practice, it is essential to inculcate the CR practice in undergraduate pharmacy education which can not only facilitate their clinical education and clinical rotations but can also help them become better clinical pharmacists. There is very limited CR employed in the pharmacy curriculum and practice in the Middle East countries. This study aimed to develop and evaluate CR practice in pharmacy undergraduates in one college of pharmacy in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

We employed a mixed-methods methodology that included two phases. In Phase I, students were introduced to CR practice ('think aloud' method) and given geriatric clinical cases which they used in two sessions together with a tutor. This was followed by the writing of SOAP notes using the tutor feedback and completion of a survey that included a self-reflection about their experience of using the CR method. Phase II included face-to-face semi-structured interviews involving selected students that were recruited via convenience sampling to further explore the issues identified in Phase I of the study.

RESULTS

Of the 155 students who completed the survey (response rate 94%), the majority of them agreed that CR using the 'think aloud' method was useful in gathering (92%) and interpreting (95%) relevant patient information, identifying medication-related problems (95%), exploring therapeutic options for the problem(s) (93%) and formulating a treatment plan for the patient (90%). Qualitative data analysis of the 12 interviews was consistent with these findings. Furthermore, it provided an insight into the challenges faced by the students in applying this CR method.

CONCLUSIONS

Students found the practice of CR using the 'think aloud' method helpful in working through given cases and taking clinical decisions. This method can be widely employed in pharmacy education and practice.

摘要

引言

鉴于临床推理(CR)在医疗实践中的广泛应用,在本科药学教育中灌输CR实践至关重要,这不仅有助于他们的临床教育和临床轮转,还能帮助他们成为更优秀的临床药剂师。中东国家药学课程和实践中采用的CR非常有限。本研究旨在开发和评估沙特阿拉伯一所药学院本科药学专业学生的CR实践。

方法

我们采用了一种混合方法,包括两个阶段。在第一阶段,向学生介绍CR实践(“大声思考”方法),并提供老年临床病例,他们与导师一起在两个环节中使用这些病例。随后,根据导师的反馈撰写SOAP笔记,并完成一项调查,其中包括对他们使用CR方法的经验进行自我反思。第二阶段包括对通过便利抽样招募的部分学生进行面对面的半结构化访谈,以进一步探讨研究第一阶段发现的问题。

结果

在完成调查的155名学生中(回复率94%),大多数人同意使用“大声思考”方法进行CR有助于收集(92%)和解释(95%)相关患者信息、识别与药物相关的问题(95%)、探索问题的治疗选择(93%)以及为患者制定治疗计划(90%)。对12次访谈的定性数据分析与这些结果一致。此外,它还深入了解了学生在应用这种CR方法时面临的挑战。

结论

学生们发现使用“大声思考”方法进行CR实践有助于处理给定病例并做出临床决策。这种方法可广泛应用于药学教育和实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ab/8596158/851f2cce55ff/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ab/8596158/851f2cce55ff/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ab/8596158/851f2cce55ff/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using 'think aloud' approach in pharmacy undergraduates - A mixed-methods study.采用“大声思考”方法对药学专业本科生临床推理能力的培养与评估——一项混合方法研究
Saudi Pharm J. 2021 Nov;29(11):1250-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
2
Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes Demonstrated by Pharmacy Students When Making Therapeutic Decisions.药学专业学生在做出治疗决策时的认知和元认知过程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(4):ajpe8817. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8817. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
3
Investigating pharmacy students' therapeutic decision-making with respect to antimicrobial stewardship cases.调查药学专业学生在抗菌药物管理病例方面的治疗决策。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03542-0.
4
Usability testing of Avoiding Diabetes Thru Action Plan Targeting (ADAPT) decision support for integrating care-based counseling of pre-diabetes in an electronic health record.通过行动计划目标预防糖尿病(ADAPT)决策支持系统在电子健康记录中整合基于护理的糖尿病前期咨询的可用性测试。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Sep;83(9):636-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 23.
5
General practice trainees' learning experiences of formative think-aloud script concordance testing.全科医学培训生的形成性出声思维脚本一致性测试学习体验。
Educ Prim Care. 2022 Jul;33(4):229-236. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2022.2057240. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
6
The impact of unfolding case studies combined with think-aloud strategies on the clinical reasoning and self-directed learning abilities of postgraduate students: A mixed methods study.展开案例研究并结合出声思维策略对研究生临床推理和自主学习能力的影响:混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Oct;80:104132. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104132. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
7
Investigating the clinical decision-making of nursing students using high-fidelity simulation, observation and think aloud: A mixed methods research study.采用高保真模拟、观察和出声思维研究护理学生的临床决策:混合方法研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Feb;79(2):811-824. doi: 10.1111/jan.15507. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
8
Analysis of Expert Feedback to Determine Intellectual Standards for Student Pharmacist Clinical Reasoning Development.分析专家反馈,以确定学生药剂师临床推理发展的知识标准。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(4):ajpe8975. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8975. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
9
Exploring the effectiveness of pharmacy curriculum in Saudi Arabia in developing leadership skills among pharmacy students from their perspective: A mixed-methods study.从沙特阿拉伯药学专业学生的角度探讨药学课程在培养其领导技能方面的有效性:一项混合方法研究。
Saudi Pharm J. 2024 Apr;32(4):101995. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.101995. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
10
Exploring community pharmacists' clinical decision-making using think aloud and protocol analysis.运用出声思维和议定书分析法探究社区药剂师的临床决策。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Apr;18(4):2606-2614. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical reasoning in emergency medical technicians and its compliance with the illness script theory: A pilot study.急救医疗技术人员的临床推理及其与疾病脚本理论的契合度:一项试点研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Apr 28;12:122. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_782_22. eCollection 2023.
2
Encouraging students' engagement and promoting deep learning in immunology through an interactive clinical case problem-solving (CCPS) approach: Perception among cohort of medical students in Oman.通过交互式临床病例解决(CCPS)方法鼓励学生参与并促进免疫学深度学习:阿曼医学生群体的认知情况
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Dec 28;11:410. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_162_22. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
A scoping review of clinical reasoning research with Asian healthcare professionals.亚洲医护专业人员临床推理研究的范围综述。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 Dec;26(5):1555-1579. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10060-z. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
2
A lesson in clinical reasoning for the pharmacy preceptor.临床推理课:给药学带教老师的启示
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jun 18;76(13):944-951. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz083.
3
Clinical Reasoning Assessment Methods: A Scoping Review and Practical Guidance.临床推理评估方法:范围综述与实践指导。
Acad Med. 2019 Jun;94(6):902-912. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002618.
4
Teaching Clinical Reasoning Piece by Piece: A Clinical Reasoning Concept-Based Learning Method.逐步教授临床推理:一种基于临床推理概念的学习方法。
J Nurs Educ. 2018 Dec 1;57(12):727-735. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20181119-05.
5
Design and delivery of a new clinical reasoning course.一门新的临床推理课程的设计与交付
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Aug;10(8):1113-1123. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
6
Clinical reasoning model for pharmacy students.面向药学专业学生的临床推理模型。
Clin Teach. 2019 Jun;16(3):253-257. doi: 10.1111/tct.12944. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
7
Multicentered Study Evaluating Pharmacy Students' Perception of Palliative Care and Clinical Reasoning Using Script Concordance Testing.一项多中心研究,采用脚本一致性测试评估药学专业学生对姑息治疗的认知及临床推理能力。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Nov;35(11):1394-1401. doi: 10.1177/1049909118772845. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
8
Measurement of critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment in culturally diverse nursing students - A literature review.不同文化背景护理专业学生批判性思维、临床推理和临床判断的测量——文献综述
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 May;30:91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
9
Thinking in Pharmacy Practice: A Study of Community Pharmacists' Clinical Reasoning in Medication Supply Using the Think-Aloud Method.药学实践中的思维:一项运用出声思维法对社区药剂师在药品供应中的临床推理进行的研究。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 Dec 31;6(1):1. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6010001.
10
Models of clinical reasoning with a focus on general practice: A critical review.以全科医疗为重点的临床推理模型:一项批判性综述。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Oct;5(4):177-184.