Suppr超能文献

药学专业学生在做出治疗决策时的认知和元认知过程。

Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes Demonstrated by Pharmacy Students When Making Therapeutic Decisions.

机构信息

Monash University, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

University of Melbourne, Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(4):ajpe8817. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8817. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

Abstract

To characterize the types of cognitive and metacognitive processes demonstrated by third-year pharmacy students during a therapeutic reasoning activity. A qualitative, descriptive study following a think-aloud protocol was used to analyze the cognitive (analytical) and metacognitive processes observed by third-year pharmacy students as they completed a 25-minute therapeutic reasoning activity. Using a deductive codebook developed from literature about reasoning, two independent coders characterized processes from students' audio-recorded, transcribed think-aloud episodes while making therapeutic decisions about simulated clinical cases. A total of 40 think-aloud episodes were transcribed among the cohort. Categorization of the think-aloud transcriptions revealed a series of cognitive analytical and metacognitive processes demonstrated by students during the therapeutic decision-making activity. A total of 1792 codes were categorized as analytical processes, falling into six major themes: 69% gathering information (1232/1792), 13% processing information (227/1792), 7% making assessments (133/1792), 1% synthesizing information (19/1792), 7% articulating evidence (117/1792), and 4% making a recommendation (64/1792). In comparison to gathering information, a much lower frequency of processing and assessment was observed for students, particularly for those that were unable to resolve the case. Students' movement between major analytical processes co-occurred commonly with metacognitive processes. Of the 918 codes categorized as metacognitive processes, two major themes arose: 28% monitoring for knowledge or emotions (257/918) and 72% controlling the planning of next steps or verification of correct information (661/918). Sequencing the codes and co-occurrences of processes allowed us to propose an integrated cognitive/metacognitive model of therapeutic reasoning for students. This study categorizes the cognitive (analytical) and metacognitive processes engaged during pharmacy students' therapeutic reasoning process. The findings can inform current instructional practices and further research into educational activities that can strengthen pharmacy students' therapeutic reasoning skills.

摘要

为了描述三年级药学专业学生在治疗推理活动中表现出的认知和元认知类型。采用出声思维法的定性描述性研究,分析了三年级药学专业学生在完成 25 分钟治疗推理活动时观察到的认知(分析)和元认知过程。使用文献中关于推理的演绎代码本,两位独立的代码员对学生在模拟临床病例中做出治疗决策时记录的音频转录的出声思维片段进行了特征描述。在整个队列中,转录了 40 次出声思维片段。对出声思维转录的分类揭示了学生在治疗决策活动中表现出的一系列认知分析和元认知过程。共有 1792 个代码被归类为分析过程,分为六个主要主题:69%的信息收集(1232/1792),13%的信息处理(227/1792),7%的评估(133/1792),1%的信息综合(19/1792),7%的证据表达(117/1792)和 4%的建议(64/1792)。与信息收集相比,学生处理和评估的频率要低得多,特别是对于那些无法解决案例的学生。学生在主要分析过程之间的移动与元认知过程经常同时发生。在被归类为元认知过程的 918 个代码中,出现了两个主要主题:28%的知识或情绪监测(257/918)和 72%的计划下一步或验证正确信息的控制(661/918)。对这些过程进行排序和并发,可以帮助我们为学生提出一个综合的治疗推理认知/元认知模型。本研究对药学专业学生治疗推理过程中涉及的认知(分析)和元认知过程进行了分类。研究结果可以为当前的教学实践提供信息,并进一步研究能够加强药学专业学生治疗推理技能的教育活动。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a Vertically Integrated Pharmacy Degree.垂直整合药学学位的发展
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Sep 23;9(4):156. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9040156.
5
Clinical decision-making: An essential skill for 21st century pharmacy practice.临床决策:21 世纪药学实践的必备技能。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 May;15(5):600-606. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
7
Assessment of student pharmacists' ethical decision-making.学生药剂师伦理决策的评估。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Nov;9(6):996-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验