• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特定项目的比例一致性效应可能会受到短期重复启动的影响。

The item-specific proportion congruency effect can be contaminated by short-term repetition priming.

作者信息

Cochrane Brett A, Pratt Jay

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan;84(1):1-9. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02403-0. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-021-02403-0
PMID:34820767
Abstract

The item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effect reflects the phenomenon that Stroop congruency effects are larger for Stroop items that are more likely to be congruent (MC) than incongruent (MI). While the ISPC effect is purported to reflect long-term memory associations, the proportion manipulation entails that stimulus repetitions vary as a function of the MC and MI conditions, suggesting that a short-term repetition priming process may also contribute. In the present study, we investigated whether the ISPC effect reflected contributions from separate long-term associative learning and short-term repetition priming processes. To do so, the magnitude of the ISPC effect was compared when stimulus repetitions were present and absent. While the ISPC effect was robust, it was revealed that removing stimulus repetitions significantly attenuated the effect. Overall, the present study indicates the ISPC effect can reflect contributions from both short-term repetition and long-term memory processes.

摘要

特定项目比例一致性(ISPC)效应反映了这样一种现象:对于更可能一致(MC)而非不一致(MI)的Stroop项目,Stroop一致性效应更大。虽然ISPC效应据称反映了长期记忆关联,但比例操纵意味着刺激重复会根据MC和MI条件而变化,这表明短期重复启动过程也可能起作用。在本研究中,我们调查了ISPC效应是否反映了单独的长期联想学习和短期重复启动过程的贡献。为此,比较了存在和不存在刺激重复时ISPC效应的大小。虽然ISPC效应很显著,但结果显示去除刺激重复会显著减弱该效应。总体而言,本研究表明ISPC效应可以反映短期重复和长期记忆过程的贡献。

相似文献

1
The item-specific proportion congruency effect can be contaminated by short-term repetition priming.特定项目的比例一致性效应可能会受到短期重复启动的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan;84(1):1-9. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02403-0. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
2
The item-specific proportion congruency effect transfers to non-category members based on broad visual similarity.基于广泛的视觉相似性,特定项目比例一致性效应会转移到非类别成员身上。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1821-1830. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02104-1. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects.一致性预示调节特定项目的比例一致性效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 May;78(4):1087-103. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1066-y.
4
Can contingency learning alone account for item-specific control? Evidence from within- and between-language ISPC effects.单纯的偶然性学习能否解释项目特异性控制?来自内-外部语言 ISPC 效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1578-90. doi: 10.1037/a0028458. Epub 2012 May 7.
5
Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects.为什么在具体项目比例一致性效应的描述中失去控制还为时尚早。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Jun;37(3):844-59. doi: 10.1037/a0019957.
6
Both task-irrelevant and task-relevant information trigger reactive conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion-congruent paradigm.在项目特定比例一致范式中,任务无关和任务相关信息都会引发反应性冲突适应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Dec;29(6):2133-2145. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02138-5. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
7
ISPC effect is not observed when the word comes too late: a time course analysis.当单词出现得太晚时,ISPC 效应不会被观察到:一个时间过程分析。
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 5;5:1410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01410. eCollection 2014.
8
On the automaticity of reactive item-specific control as evidenced by its efficiency under load.根据反应特定项目控制的自动性在负荷下的效率得到证明。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Jul;47(7):908-933. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000914.
9
Additive Effects of Item-Specific and Congruency Sequence Effects in the Vocal Stroop Task.言语Stroop任务中特定项目效应与一致性序列效应的累加效应
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 24;10:860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00860. eCollection 2019.
10
Resolved but not forgotten: Stroop conflict dredges up the past.已解决但未被遗忘:斯特鲁普冲突勾起往事。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 20;5:1327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01327. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes.一种空间版 Stroop 任务,用于独立于非冲突过程考察前摄和反应控制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1259-1286. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02892-9. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
2
Accounting for Proportion Congruency Effects in the Stroop Task in a Confounded Setup: Retrieval of Stimulus-Response Episodes Explains it All.在混淆设置中考虑斯特鲁普任务中的比例一致性效应:刺激-反应情节的检索解释了一切。
J Cogn. 2022 Jun 29;5(1):39. doi: 10.5334/joc.232. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The Law of Recency: An Episodic Stimulus-Response Retrieval Account of Habit Acquisition.近因律:习惯习得的情景刺激-反应检索解释
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 15;10:2927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927. eCollection 2019.
2
The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects.正、负重复效应的表象基础。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Mar;46(3):252-263. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000713. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
3
Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.在混杂最小化任务中,多种期望是一致性序列效应的基础。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102869. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102869. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
4
When stimulus-driven control settings compete: On the dominance of categories as cues for control.当刺激驱动的控制设置相互竞争时:论类别作为控制线索的主导地位。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1905-1932. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000580. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
5
Beyond trial-by-trial adaptation: A quantification of the time scale of cognitive control.超越逐次试验适应:认知控制时间尺度的量化
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Mar;43(3):509-517. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000324. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
6
Resolved but not forgotten: Stroop conflict dredges up the past.已解决但未被遗忘:斯特鲁普冲突勾起往事。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 20;5:1327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01327. eCollection 2014.
7
Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.控制颜色-词 Stroop 干扰的项目水平的汇聚证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):433-49. doi: 10.1037/a0029145. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
8
Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects.为什么在具体项目比例一致性效应的描述中失去控制还为时尚早。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Jun;37(3):844-59. doi: 10.1037/a0019957.
9
Nonstrategic contributions to putatively strategic effects in selective attention tasks.在选择性注意任务中对假定的策略性效应的非策略性贡献。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Aug;34(4):1044-52. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.1044.
10
The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.斯特鲁普效应:为何一致比例与一致性无关,而与偶然性息息相关。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):514-23. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514.