Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), Research Group MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Scand J Pain. 2021 Sep 30;22(2):396-409. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0091. Print 2022 Apr 26.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the immediate and three days postintervention effect of one dry needling session compared to one sham needling session on pain, central pain processing, muscle co-contraction and spatiotemporal parameters during gait in knee osteoarthritis patients. METHODS: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Sixty-one knee osteoarthritis patients were randomly assigned to the dry needling or sham needling group. Primary outcomes were pain and central pain processing. Secondary outcomes included muscle co-contraction and spatiotemporal parameters during gait. Patients were assessed at baseline and 15 min after the intervention, and pain also three days after the intervention. Linear mixed models were used to examine between- and within-group differences. RESULTS: No significant between-group differences for pain were found, but within-group scores showed a significant decrease 15 min after sham needling and three days after dry needling. The mean conditioned pain modulation effect measured at the m. Trapezius worsened significantly 15 min after sham needling compared to after dry needling (between-group difference). However, individual conditioned pain modulation percentage scores remained stable over time. Various significant within-group differences were found 15 min after sham needling: a decrease of conditioned pain modulation measured at m. Quadriceps and m. Trapezius and stride- and step-time scores, and an increase in step length and widespread pain pressure threshold. A significant decrease in muscle co-contraction index of the m. Vastus Medialis and Semitendinosus was found as within-group difference 15 min after dry needling. CONCLUSIONS: Dry needling has no larger effect on pain, central pain processing, muscle co-contraction and gait pattern 15 min and three days postintervention compared to sham needling. Mean conditioned pain modulation scores worsened after sham needling compared to after dry needling. Further research remains necessary.
目的:评估单次干针治疗与单次假针治疗对膝骨关节炎患者疼痛、中枢疼痛处理、肌肉协同收缩以及步态时空参数的即时和干预后 3 天的影响。
方法:进行了一项双盲随机对照试验。61 例膝骨关节炎患者被随机分配到干针组或假针组。主要结局是疼痛和中枢疼痛处理。次要结局包括肌肉协同收缩和步态时空参数。患者在基线和干预后 15 分钟以及干预后 3 天进行评估。线性混合模型用于检验组间和组内差异。
结果:两组间疼痛无显著差异,但组内评分显示假针治疗后 15 分钟和干针治疗后 3 天显著下降。斜方肌 m. 条件疼痛调制效应的平均值在假针治疗后 15 分钟明显恶化,与干针治疗后相比(组间差异)。然而,个体条件疼痛调制百分比评分在整个时间内保持稳定。假针治疗后 15 分钟,各种显著的组内差异被发现:条件疼痛调制在 m. 股四头肌和斜方肌 m. 以及步幅和步长时间评分中降低,而步长和广泛疼痛压力阈值增加。在干针治疗后 15 分钟,股内侧肌和半腱肌 m. 的肌肉协同收缩指数出现显著的组内下降。
结论:与假针相比,干针治疗在干预后 15 分钟和 3 天对疼痛、中枢疼痛处理、肌肉协同收缩和步态模式没有更大的影响。与干针治疗相比,假针治疗后平均条件疼痛调制评分恶化。需要进一步的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-4-15
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025-2-15