Laboratory of Rehabilitation Technologies, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.
Neurol Sci. 2022 Feb;43(2):847-862. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05770-6. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
Telerehabilitation (TR) seems to be an encouraging solution for the delivery of cognitive treatments in patients with neurological disorders. This study was aimed to analyze and synthesize the evidence on the efficacy of cognitive TR interventions in patients with neurological diseases, compared with conventional face-to-face rehabilitation. From a total of 4485 records, 9 studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. At the end of the process, 7 studies remained for quantitative analysis. By comparing TR with face-to-face treatments for cognitive impairments, we assessed improvements in global cognitive domain (Mini Mental State Exam) (MD = -0.86; 95% CI -2.43, 0.72, I = 0%), in learning and memory domains (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI -0.22, 0.74, I = 24%), in verbal fluency (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI -0.47, 0.62, I = 0%), and in executive functions (i.e., problem-solving, central processing speed and working memory) (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI 0.06, 0.71, I = 0%). In all the included studies, improvement in the performance of the TR groups was comparable to that achieved through face-to-face intervention. Significant differences between those two modalities of providing treatments were observed for working memory and total executive function comparison, in favor of TR. The results of this study can sustain the efficacy of TR and its application for the treatment of neurological patients, especially when treated for executive function impairments.
远程康复(TR)似乎是为神经障碍患者提供认知治疗的一种有前途的解决方案。本研究旨在分析和综合神经疾病患者认知 TR 干预与传统面对面康复相比的疗效证据。在总共 4485 条记录中,有 9 项研究符合定性分析的纳入标准。在整个过程结束时,有 7 项研究仍可进行定量分析。通过比较 TR 与针对认知障碍的面对面治疗,我们评估了整体认知领域(迷你精神状态检查)的改善(MD = -0.86;95%CI -2.43,0.72,I = 0%),学习和记忆领域(SMD = 0.26,95%CI -0.22,0.74,I = 24%),语言流畅性(SMD = 0.08,95%CI -0.47,0.62,I = 0%)和执行功能(即解决问题、中央处理速度和工作记忆)(SMD = 0.38,95%CI 0.06,0.71,I = 0%)。在所有纳入的研究中,TR 组的表现改善与面对面干预所取得的改善相当。在工作记忆和总执行功能比较方面,两种治疗方式之间观察到显著差异,TR 更有利。这项研究的结果可以支持 TR 的疗效及其在治疗神经患者中的应用,特别是在治疗执行功能障碍时。