Pramuka Michael, van Roosmalen Linda
Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh.
Int J Telerehabil. 2009 Sep 4;1(1):85-98. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2009.6016. eCollection 2009 Fall.
In the fields of telehealth and telemedicine, phone and/or video technologies are key to the successful provision of services such as remote monitoring and visits. How do these technologies affect service accessibility, effectiveness, quality, and usefulness when applied to rehabilitation services in the field of telerehabilitation? To answer this question, we provide a overview of the complex network of available technologies and discuss how they link to rehabilitation applications, services, and practices as well as to the telerehabilitation end-user. This white paper will first present the numerous professional considerations that shape the use of technology in telerehabilitation service and set it somewhat apart from telemedicine. It will then provide an overview of concepts essential to usability analysis; present a summary of various telerehabilitation technologies and their strengths and limitations, and consider how the technologies interface with end users' clinical needs for service accessibility, effectiveness, quality, and usefulness. The paper will highlight a conceptual framework (including task analyses and usability issues) that underlies a functional match between telerehabilitation technologies, clinical applications, and end-user capabilities for telerehabilitation purposes. Finally, we will discuss pragmatic issues related to user integration of telerehabilitation technology versus traditional face-to-face approaches.
在远程医疗和远程医学领域,电话和/或视频技术是成功提供远程监测和远程问诊等服务的关键。当这些技术应用于远程康复领域的康复服务时,它们如何影响服务的可及性、有效性、质量和实用性?为回答这个问题,我们概述了现有技术的复杂网络,并讨论它们如何与康复应用、服务和实践以及远程康复终端用户相联系。本白皮书将首先阐述影响远程康复服务中技术使用的众多专业考量因素,并使其在一定程度上有别于远程医学。接着,它将概述可用性分析的基本概念;总结各种远程康复技术及其优缺点,并思考这些技术如何与终端用户在服务可及性、有效性、质量和实用性方面的临床需求相衔接。本文将突出一个概念框架(包括任务分析和可用性问题),该框架构成了远程康复技术、临床应用与远程康复目的终端用户能力之间功能匹配的基础。最后,我们将讨论与远程康复技术与传统面对面方法的用户整合相关的实际问题。