• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非和赞比亚背景下修订后的心理健康素养量表的建构效度和内部一致性。

Construct validity and internal consistency of the revised Mental Health Literacy Scale in South African and Zambian contexts.

机构信息

Turku University of Applied Science, Turku, Finland.

Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2022 Mar;9(2):966-977. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1132. Epub 2021 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.1132
PMID:34822738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8859090/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the construct validity and internal consistency of the revised Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) in South Africa (SA) and Zambia.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2018 and December 2019.

METHODS

The study population comprised PHC workers (n = 454) in five districts in SA and Zambia. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to explore the construct validity, and Cronbach's alpha was applied to measure the internal consistency of the MHLS.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha values for three attributes were below the appropriate level, but the value was strong (0.804) for the whole scale. The study found nine components explaining ~59% of the total variance of variables. All MHLS items loaded to main attributes based on the theory of MHL. The results stated that the revised version of the MHLS is a construct valid instrument with strong internal consistency.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估修订后的心理健康素养量表(MHLS)在南非(SA)和赞比亚的结构效度和内部一致性。

设计

本横断面研究于 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 12 月进行。

方法

研究人群包括来自 SA 和赞比亚五个地区的初级卫生保健工作者(n=454)。主成分分析(PCA)用于探索结构效度,Cronbach's alpha 用于测量 MHLS 的内部一致性。

结果

三个属性的 Cronbach's alpha 值低于适当水平,但整个量表的数值较强(0.804)。研究发现,九个成分解释了变量总方差的~59%。所有 MHLS 项目均根据 MHL 理论加载到主要属性。结果表明,修订后的 MHLS 是一种具有较强内部一致性的结构有效工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/638d/8859090/f53a57f6269e/NOP2-9-966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/638d/8859090/f53a57f6269e/NOP2-9-966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/638d/8859090/f53a57f6269e/NOP2-9-966-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Construct validity and internal consistency of the revised Mental Health Literacy Scale in South African and Zambian contexts.南非和赞比亚背景下修订后的心理健康素养量表的建构效度和内部一致性。
Nurs Open. 2022 Mar;9(2):966-977. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1132. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
2
Content validation of Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) for primary health care workers in South Africa and Zambia ─ a heterogeneous expert panel method.南非和赞比亚初级卫生保健工作者的心理健康素养量表(MHLS)内容验证 ─ 一种异质专家小组方法。
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1668215. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1668215.
3
Mental health literacy among primary healthcare workers in South Africa and Zambia.南非和赞比亚初级卫生保健工作者的心理健康素养。
Brain Behav. 2022 Dec;12(12):e2807. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2807. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
4
A modified version of the mental health literacy scale (MHLS) in Iranian people.伊朗人心理健康素养量表(MHLS)的修订版。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 23;21(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03050-3.
5
Slovenian Validation of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (S-MHLS) on the General Population: A Four-Factor Model.《精神卫生素养量表(S-MHLS)在普通人群中的斯洛文尼亚验证:四因素模型》
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580211047193. doi: 10.1177/00469580211047193.
6
The Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS): A new scale-based measure of mental health literacy.心理健康素养量表 (MHLS):一种新的基于量表的心理健康素养衡量工具。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Sep 30;229(1-2):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.064. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
7
German translation and psychometric evaluation of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS-GER) in a general population sample and in patients with acute myocardial infarction.在一般人群样本和急性心肌梗死患者中,对心理健康素养量表(MHLS-GER)进行德文翻译和心理计量学评估。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Oct;178:201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
8
Schools as a Source of Mental Health Literacy: Adjusting and Validating a Mental Health Literacy Scale.学校作为心理健康素养的来源:调整和验证心理健康素养量表。
Health Promot Pract. 2024 May;25(3):391-398. doi: 10.1177/15248399231161090. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
9
Mental Health Literacy in Healthcare Students: An Expansion of the Mental Health Literacy Scale.医疗专业学生的心理健康素养:心理健康素养量表的扩展。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;17(3):948. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030948.
10
Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Mental Health Literacy Scale Among Nurses.护士群体中精神卫生素养量表中文版的效度验证与心理测量学测试
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 26;12:791883. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.791883. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Fostering Mental Health Literacy Among Primary School Professionals: Evaluating the Impact of an Online Training Program 'Well@School'.在小学专业人员中培养心理健康素养:评估在线培训项目“Well@School”的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 15;22(3):435. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030435.
2
Mental health literacy among primary healthcare workers in South Africa and Zambia.南非和赞比亚初级卫生保健工作者的心理健康素养。
Brain Behav. 2022 Dec;12(12):e2807. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2807. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
3
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Strengthening mental health systems in Zambia.加强赞比亚的心理健康系统。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Apr 16;14:28. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00360-z. eCollection 2020.
2
Content validation of Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) for primary health care workers in South Africa and Zambia ─ a heterogeneous expert panel method.南非和赞比亚初级卫生保健工作者的心理健康素养量表(MHLS)内容验证 ─ 一种异质专家小组方法。
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1668215. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1668215.
3
Creating Evidence-Based Youth Mental Health Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Description of the Integrated Approach to Addressing the Issue of Youth Depression in Malawi and Tanzania.
测量健康素养:1993 年至 2021 年工具的系统评价和文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
在撒哈拉以南非洲制定基于证据的青年心理健康政策:对马拉维和坦桑尼亚解决青年抑郁症问题综合方法的描述。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 28;10:542. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00542. eCollection 2019.
4
Design and Development Process of a Youth Depression Screening m-Health Application for Primary Health Care Workers in South Africa and Zambia: An Overview of the MEGA Project.南非和赞比亚面向初级卫生保健工作者的青少年抑郁症筛查移动健康应用程序的设计与开发过程:MEGA项目概述
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Jan;41(1):24-30. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2019.1604919. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
5
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家层面 195 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2017 年 354 种疾病和伤害导致的发病率、患病率和伤残损失寿命年:基于 2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
The experience of being a psychiatric nurse in South Africa: A qualitative systematic review.南非精神科护士的体验:一项定性系统评价。
Nurs Outlook. 2018 May-Jun;66(3):293-310. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
7
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
8
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
Addressing Adolescent Depression in Tanzania: Positive Primary Care Workforce Outcomes Using a Training Cascade Model.应对坦桑尼亚青少年抑郁症:采用培训级联模型取得积极的基层医疗劳动力成果。
Depress Res Treat. 2017;2017:9109086. doi: 10.1155/2017/9109086. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
10
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.