Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Nov 30;78(22):2147-2157. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.861.
Surgical risk, age, perceived life expectancy, and valve durability influence the choice between surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The contemporaneous life expectancy after SAVR, in relation to surgical risk and age, is unknown.
The purpose of this study was to determine median survival time in relation to surgical risk and chronological age in SAVR patients.
Patients ≥60 years with aortic stenosis who underwent isolated SAVR with a bioprosthesis (n = 8,353) were risk-stratified before surgery into low, intermediate, or high surgical risk using the logistic EuroSCORE (2001-2011) or EuroSCORE II (2012-2017) and divided into age groups. Median survival time and cumulative 5-year mortality were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox regression analysis was used to further determine the importance of age.
There were 7,123 (85.1%) low-risk patients, 942 (11.3%) intermediate-risk patients, and 288 (3.5%) high-risk patients. Median survival time was 10.9 years (95% confidence interval: 10.6-11.2 years) in low-risk, 7.3 years (7.0-7.9 years) in intermediate-risk, and 5.8 years (5.4-6.5 years) in high-risk patients. The 5-year cumulative mortality was 16.5% (15.5%-17.4%), 30.7% (27.5%-33.7%), and 43.0% (36.8%-48.7%), respectively. In low-risk patients, median survival time ranged from 16.2 years in patients aged 60 to 64 years to 6.1 years in patients aged ≥85 years. Age was associated with 5-year mortality only in low-risk patients (interaction P < 0.001).
Eighty-five percent of SAVR patients receiving bioprostheses have low surgical risk. Estimated survival is substantial following SAVR, especially in younger, low-risk patients, which should be considered in Heart Team discussions.
外科手术风险、年龄、预期寿命和瓣膜耐久性会影响主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)和经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)之间的选择。目前尚不清楚 SAVR 术后与外科手术风险和年龄相关的同期预期寿命。
本研究旨在确定 SAVR 患者与手术风险和年龄相关的中位生存时间。
选择 8353 例年龄≥60 岁、接受生物瓣 SAVR 的主动脉瓣狭窄患者,根据手术风险和 EuroSCORE(2001-2011 年)或 EuroSCORE II(2012-2017 年)将患者术前分为低危、中危或高危,并分为年龄组。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线估计中位生存时间和累积 5 年死亡率。Cox 回归分析用于进一步确定年龄的重要性。
低危患者 7123 例(85.1%),中危患者 942 例(11.3%),高危患者 288 例(3.5%)。低危患者中位生存时间为 10.9 年(95%置信区间:10.6-11.2 年),中危患者为 7.3 年(7.0-7.9 年),高危患者为 5.8 年(5.4-6.5 年)。5 年累积死亡率分别为 16.5%(15.5%-17.4%)、30.7%(27.5%-33.7%)和 43.0%(36.8%-48.7%)。在低危患者中,60-64 岁患者的中位生存时间为 16.2 年,≥85 岁患者的中位生存时间为 6.1 年。年龄仅与低危患者的 5 年死亡率相关(交互 P<0.001)。
接受生物瓣 SAVR 的患者中 85%为低危患者。SAVR 后生存估计值较高,尤其是在年轻、低危患者中,这应在心脏团队讨论中考虑。