Jackson Danielle S, Nguemeni Tiako Max Jordan, Jordan Ayana
Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 671 Hoes Lane West, 2nd Floor, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/MaxJordan_N.
Med Clin North Am. 2022 Jan;106(1):29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2021.08.008.
The Half-Century long problem of addiction treatment disparities. We cannot imagine addressing disparities in addiction treatment without first acknowledging and deconstructing the etiology of this inequity. This article examines the history of addiction treatment disparities beginning with early twentieth-century drug policies. We begin by discussing structural racism, its contribution to treatment disparities, using opioid use disorder as a case study to highlight the importance of a structural competency framework in obtaining care. We conclude by discussing diversity in the workforce as an additional tool to minimizing disparities. Addiction treatment should be aimed at addressing care delivery in the context of the social, economic, and political determinants of health, which require appreciation of their historical origins to move toward equitable treatment.
长达半个世纪的成瘾治疗差距问题。在没有首先承认并解构这种不平等的病因的情况下,我们无法想象解决成瘾治疗中的差距问题。本文从20世纪早期的毒品政策开始,审视成瘾治疗差距的历史。我们首先讨论结构性种族主义及其对治疗差距的影响,以阿片类药物使用障碍为例,强调结构性能力框架在获得治疗方面的重要性。我们通过讨论劳动力多样性作为减少差距的额外工具来得出结论。成瘾治疗应旨在解决在健康的社会、经济和政治决定因素背景下的医疗服务提供问题,而这需要了解其历史根源,以实现公平治疗。