Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;12:1401221. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401221. eCollection 2024.
Racism is embedded in the fabric of society at structural, disciplinary, hegemonic, and interpersonal levels, working as a mechanism that drives health disparities. In particular, stigmatized views of substance use get entangled with racialization, serving as a tool to uphold oppressive systems. While national health institutions have made commitments to dismantle these systems in the United States, anti-racism has not been integrated into biomedical research practice. The ways in which substance use researchers use and interpret race data-without engaging in structural racism as a mechanism of health inequity-can only be described as inadequate. Drawing upon concepts from the Public Health Critical Race praxis, QuantCrit, and an anti-racism research framework, we recommend a set of guidelines to help biomedical researchers conceptualize and engage with race more responsibly in substance use research.
种族主义存在于社会结构、纪律、霸权和人际关系等各个层面,是造成健康不平等的主要因素。特别是,对物质使用的污名化观点与种族化交织在一起,成为维护压迫性制度的工具。尽管美国的国家卫生机构已经承诺要消除这些制度,但反种族主义并没有融入生物医学研究实践中。物质使用研究人员使用和解释种族数据的方式——没有将结构性种族主义作为健康不平等的机制——只能说是不充分的。借鉴公共卫生批判种族理论实践、量化批判和反种族主义研究框架中的概念,我们建议了一套准则,以帮助生物医学研究人员在物质使用研究中更负责任地构思和处理种族问题。