Dar Qurratul-Ain, Avoricani Alba, Hayes Westley T, Levy Kenneth H, Wang Hanbin, Koehler Steven M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY.
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Jan;48(1):89.e1-89.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.09.028. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
Differences in range of motion, pinch strength, biomechanical strength, or joint angulation have previously been investigated for various means of treatment of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears. We sought to address a gap in the literature by comparing thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint angle measurements and biomechanical strength before complete, acute UCL tear and after repair with suture anchors (SA), suture tape (ST) anchor augmentation, or reconstruction with palmaris longus graft (PL).
Thumbs and, if present, the PL tendon were harvested from 15 fresh-frozen cadavers. Each thumb specimen was secured into a servohydraulic biomechanical testing frame to evaluate native radiographic MCP joint angles at 0° flexion when loaded with 0, 5, and 13 N of radial force. Subsequently, a single hand surgeon (S.M.K.) performed complete transection and UCL repair via 1 of 3 methods: SA (n = 5), ST (n = 5), or reconstruction with PL (n = 5). Following repair, MCP joint angles were radiographically evaluated. Specimens that did not fail during joint angle testing were transferred to a separate testing frame for load-to-failure testing. Angle measurements and mean load-to-failure were compared between the groups, and angulation was also compared with each group's native control.
Both ST and SA groups demonstrated comparable stiffness to their native controls, whereas the PL group was significantly more lax. The ST repair was significantly stiffer than the other constructs. ST also required higher forces to reach failure compared to both SA and PL. No difference was found between SA and PL groups.
Although both ST and SA constructs recapitulate native joint stiffness, repair with ST demonstrated the greatest biomechanical strength in stiffness and load-to-failure.
For complete, acute tears of the thumb UCL, ST may be superior for maintaining MCP joint stability and strength over SA and PL.
先前已针对尺侧副韧带(UCL)撕裂的各种治疗方法,对活动范围、捏力、生物力学强度或关节角度的差异进行了研究。我们试图通过比较拇指掌指(MCP)关节角度测量值以及在完全急性UCL撕裂之前和之后使用缝线锚钉(SA)、缝线带(ST)锚钉增强或掌长肌腱移植(PL)重建后的生物力学强度,来填补文献中的空白。
从15具新鲜冷冻尸体上获取拇指以及(如有)PL肌腱。将每个拇指标本固定在伺服液压生物力学测试框架中,以评估在施加0、5和13 N径向力时0°屈曲位的原始X线片MCP关节角度。随后,由一名手外科医生(S.M.K.)通过以下3种方法之一进行完全横断和UCL修复:SA(n = 5)、ST(n = 5)或PL重建(n = 5)。修复后,通过X线片评估MCP关节角度。在关节角度测试中未失效的标本被转移到单独的测试框架中进行失效载荷测试。比较各组之间的角度测量值和平均失效载荷,并将角度与每组的原始对照进行比较。
ST组和SA组均表现出与其原始对照相当的刚度,而PL组明显更松弛。ST修复比其他结构明显更硬。与SA组和PL组相比,ST达到失效也需要更高的力。SA组和PL组之间未发现差异。
尽管ST和SA结构均重现了原始关节刚度,但ST修复在刚度和失效载荷方面表现出最大的生物力学强度。
对于拇指UCL的完全急性撕裂,在维持MCP关节稳定性和强度方面,ST可能优于SA和PL。