• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修复失败后的桡尺侧副韧带修复术伴缝合增强的桡尺侧副韧带再固定的生物力学评估。

Biomechanical assessment of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction after failed ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture augmentation.

机构信息

Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, CA, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.

Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, CA, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):1477-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.034. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.034
PMID:33276162
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair with single-strand suture augmentation has been introduced as a viable surgical option for throwers with acute UCL tears. For the original single-strand suture augmentation construct, revision UCL reconstructions can be challenging owing to the bone loss at the site of anchor insertion in the center of the sublime tubercle. This biomechanical study assessed a small-diameter (1.5-mm) ulnar bone tunnel technique for double-strand suture-augmented UCL repair that may be more easily converted to salvage UCL reconstruction if necessary, as well as a salvage UCL reconstruction with a docking technique after a failed primary suture-augmented UCL repair.

METHODS

In 7 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (mean age, 66.3 years), a custom shoulder testing system was used to simulate the late cocking phase of throwing. The elbow valgus opening angle was evaluated using a MicroScribe 3DLX device for sequentially increasing valgus torque (from 0.75 to 7.5 Nm in 0.75-Nm increments) at 90° of flexion. Valgus angular stiffness (in newton-meters per degree) was defined as the correlation of sequentially increasing valgus torque with the valgus opening angle through simple linear regression (slope of valgus torque - valgus opening angle curve). Four conditions were tested: intact elbow, distal UCL avulsion, primary UCL repair with double-strand suture augmentation using small-diameter bone tunnels, and subsequent docking UCL reconstruction in the same specimen. Load-to-failure tests were performed for primary UCL repair with double-strand suture augmentation and subsequent docking UCL reconstruction.

RESULTS

With increasing elbow valgus torque, the valgus opening angle increased linearly in each condition (R ≥ 0.98, P < .001). Distal UCL avulsion resulted in significantly decreased angular stiffness compared with the intact UCL (P < .001). Both UCL repair with double-strand suture augmentation and subsequent UCL reconstruction showed significantly increased angular stiffness values compared with distal UCL avulsion (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). On load-to-failure testing, there was no significant difference in stiffness, yield torque, and ultimate torque between the primary suture-augmented UCL repair and the subsequent UCL reconstruction (P = .11, P = .77, and P = .38, respectively). In all specimens undergoing the small-diameter ulnar bone tunnel technique for double-strand suture-augmented UCL repair, failure occurred by retear of the repaired ligament without causing an ulnar bone bridge fracture.

CONCLUSION

Primary UCL repair with double-strand suture augmentation using small-diameter bone tunnels was able to restore valgus stability. When failure occurs, this technique retains enough cortical bone to permit subsequent docking UCL reconstruction.

摘要

背景

对于急性 UCL 撕裂的投掷者,采用单股缝线增强的尺侧副韧带 (UCL) 修复已被引入作为一种可行的手术选择。对于最初的单股缝线增强结构,由于在 sublime 结节中心的锚钉插入部位的骨质丢失, revision UCL 重建可能具有挑战性。这项生物力学研究评估了一种小直径(1.5 毫米)尺骨骨隧道技术,用于双股缝线增强 UCL 修复,如果需要,该技术可能更容易转换为 salvage UCL 重建,并且在初次缝线增强 UCL 修复失败后,采用 docking 技术进行 salvage UCL 重建。

方法

在 7 个新鲜冷冻的上肢尸体标本(平均年龄 66.3 岁)中,使用定制的肩部测试系统模拟投掷的晚期扣球阶段。使用 MicroScribe 3DLX 设备评估肘外翻开口角度,在 90°屈曲下,逐渐增加外翻扭矩(以 0.75Nm 递增至 7.5Nm)。外翻角刚度(牛顿米/度)定义为通过简单线性回归(外翻扭矩-外翻开口角度曲线的斜率),逐渐增加外翻扭矩与外翻开口角度之间的相关性。测试了 4 种情况:完整的肘部、远端 UCL 撕脱、使用小直径骨隧道的初次 UCL 修复的双股缝线增强、以及同一标本中的后续 docking UCL 重建。对初次 UCL 修复的双股缝线增强和后续的 docking UCL 重建进行了失效负载测试。

结果

随着肘外翻扭矩的增加,每种情况下的外翻开口角度都呈线性增加(R ≥ 0.98,P<.001)。远端 UCL 撕脱与完整的 UCL 相比,角刚度明显降低(P<.001)。UCL 修复的双股缝线增强和随后的 UCL 重建与远端 UCL 撕脱相比,角刚度值明显增加(P<.001 和 P<.001)。在失效负载测试中,初次缝线增强 UCL 修复和随后的 UCL 重建之间的刚度、屈服扭矩和最终扭矩没有显著差异(P=0.11、P=0.77 和 P=0.38)。在所有接受小直径尺骨骨隧道技术进行双股缝线增强 UCL 修复的标本中,修复韧带的再次撕裂而不是尺骨骨桥骨折导致失效。

结论

使用小直径骨隧道的初次 UCL 修复的双股缝线增强能够恢复外翻稳定性。当失效发生时,该技术保留了足够的皮质骨,允许随后进行 docking UCL 重建。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical assessment of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction after failed ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture augmentation.修复失败后的桡尺侧副韧带修复术伴缝合增强的桡尺侧副韧带再固定的生物力学评估。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):1477-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.034. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
2
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Augmentation.尺侧副韧带重建中缝合增强与非缝合增强的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(9):2508-2514. doi: 10.1177/03635465221101421. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
3
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With a Modified Docking Technique With and Without Suture Augmentation.尺侧副韧带重建的生物力学比较:改良的对接技术与带和不带缝线增强的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):928-932. doi: 10.1177/0363546518820304. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
4
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Modified Internal Brace Construct for the Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries.一种改良的内部支撑结构治疗尺侧副韧带损伤的生物力学评估
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Oct 2;7(10):2325967119874135. doi: 10.1177/2325967119874135. eCollection 2019 Oct.
5
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With the Docking Technique Versus Repair With Internal Bracing.尺侧副韧带重建的生物力学比较:采用对接技术与内部支撑修复。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3495-3501. doi: 10.1177/0363546518803771. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
6
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation: Can You Overtighten?尺侧副韧带修复联合缝线袢增强:会过紧吗?
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Feb;52(2):485-491. doi: 10.1177/03635465231220382. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Restoration of the Ulnar Footprint vs Traditional Ulnar Tunnels in Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.解剖修复尺侧附韧带重建中尺侧足迹与传统尺侧隧道的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Apr;50(5):1375-1381. doi: 10.1177/03635465211054475. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
8
Augmented Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Structural Bioinductive Scaffold: A Biomechanical Study.增强尺侧副韧带修复结构生物诱导支架:一项生物力学研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 May;52(6):1483-1490. doi: 10.1177/03635465241236465. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
9
Biomechanical Effect of Differential Tensioning on Suture-Augmented Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow.不同张力对肘部尺侧副韧带缝合增强重建的生物力学影响
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jan;51(1):205-213. doi: 10.1177/03635465221131905. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
10
Anatomic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Ulnar Tunnel Position in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.尺侧副韧带重建术中尺神经隧道位置的解剖与生物力学评估。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3491-3497. doi: 10.1177/0363546519880182. Epub 2019 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical management of acute combined injuries of the ipsilateral wrist and elbow joints.同侧腕关节和肘关节急性复合伤的手术治疗
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Feb 15;11(3):154. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6598.