Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022 Feb;48(2):283-292. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.10.018. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
Three-dimensional ultrasound (US) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is limited by the field-of-view of the 3D-US transducer. To obtain an extended field-of-view (XFoV), two transducer navigation system-assisted US protocols have been developed: XFoV-2D and XFoV-3D. In this study, the XFoV US protocols were compared with the currently available 3D-US protocol with standard field-of-view (FoV-st) and the established gold standard, computed tomography angiography (CTA). A total of 65 patients with AAA were included, and AAA imaging was processed offline with prototype software. The novel XFoV-2D and XFoV-3D protocols allowed for assessment of full AAA volume in significantly more patients (45/65 [69%] and 43/65 [66%], respectively), compared with the current 3D-US standard, FoV-st (30/65 [46%] patients). The mean difference in AAA volume estimation between each XFoV US protocol and 3-D CTA differed significantly (XFoV-2D: 16.9 mL, XFoV-3D: 7.6 mL, p = 0.002), indicating that XFoV-3D agreed best with 3D-CTA. No significant difference was found in the variance of full AAA volume quantification between each XFoV US protocol and CTA (p = 0.49). It is concluded that the XFoV US protocols improved the generation of full AAA volumes compared with the currently available 3D-US technology, with AAA volume estimates comparable to CTA estimates.
三维超声(US)检查腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的视野有限。为了获得扩展视野(XFoV),已经开发了两种基于换能器导航系统的超声协议:XFoV-2D 和 XFoV-3D。在这项研究中,将 XFoV US 协议与当前具有标准视野(FoV-st)的 3D-US 协议和既定的金标准,计算机断层血管造影(CTA)进行了比较。共纳入 65 例 AAA 患者,使用原型软件对 AAA 成像进行离线处理。与当前的 3D-US 标准 FoV-st(46%患者)相比,新型 XFoV-2D 和 XFoV-3D 协议可以评估更多患者的整个 AAA 体积(分别为 45/65 [69%] 和 43/65 [66%])。每个 XFoV US 协议与 3-D CTA 之间的 AAA 体积估计的平均差异均具有统计学意义(XFoV-2D:16.9 mL,XFoV-3D:7.6 mL,p=0.002),表明 XFoV-3D 与 3D-CTA 最吻合。每个 XFoV US 协议与 CTA 之间的全 AAA 体积定量的方差无统计学差异(p=0.49)。结论是,与当前可用的 3D-US 技术相比,XFoV US 协议改善了全 AAA 体积的生成,并且 AAA 体积的估计与 CTA 估计相当。