Jansen Larissa C, Schwab Hans-Martin, van de Vosse Frans N, van Sambeek Marc R H M, Lopata Richard G P
Photoacoustics and Ultrasound Laboratory Eindhoven (PULS/e), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Front Med Technol. 2023 Jan 6;4:1052213. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.1052213. eCollection 2022.
Rupture risk estimation of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients is currently based on the maximum diameter of the AAA. Mechanical properties that characterize the mechanical state of the vessel may serve as a better rupture risk predictor. Non-electrocardiogram-gated (non-ECG-gated) freehand 2D ultrasound imaging is a fast approach from which a reconstructed volumetric image of the aorta can be obtained. From this 3D image, the geometry, volume, and maximum diameter can be obtained. The distortion caused by the pulsatility of the vessel during the acquisition is usually neglected, while it could provide additional quantitative parameters of the vessel wall. In this study, a framework was established to semi-automatically segment probe tracked images of healthy aortas ( = 10) and AAAs ( = 16), after which patient-specific geometries of the vessel at end diastole (ED), end systole (ES), and at the mean arterial pressure (MAP) state were automatically assessed using heart frequency detection and envelope detection. After registration AAA geometries were compared to the gold standard computed tomography (CT). Local mechanical properties, i.e., compliance, distensibility and circumferential strain, were computed from the assessed ED and ES geometries for healthy aortas and AAAs, and by using measured brachial pulse pressure values. Globally, volume, compliance, and distensibility were computed. Geometries were in good agreement with CT geometries, with a median similarity index and interquartile range of 0.91 [0.90-0.92] and mean Hausdorff distance and interquartile range of 4.7 [3.9-5.6] mm. As expected, distensibility (Healthy aortas: 80 ± 15·10 kPa; AAAs: 29 ± 9.6·10 kPa) and circumferential strain (Healthy aortas: 0.25 ± 0.03; AAAs: 0.15 ± 0.03) were larger in healthy vessels compared to AAAs. Circumferential strain values were in accordance with literature. Global healthy aorta distensibility was significantly different from AAAs, as was demonstrated with a Wilcoxon test (-value = 2·10). Improved image contrast and lateral resolution could help to further improve segmentation to improve mechanical characterization. The presented work has demonstrated how besides accurate geometrical assessment freehand 2D ultrasound imaging is a promising tool for additional mechanical property characterization of AAAs.
腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者的破裂风险评估目前基于腹主动脉瘤的最大直径。表征血管力学状态的力学特性可能是更好的破裂风险预测指标。非心电图门控(非ECG门控)徒手二维超声成像是一种快速方法,可据此获得主动脉的重建容积图像。从该三维图像中,可以获取几何形状、体积和最大直径。采集过程中血管搏动引起的失真通常被忽略,而它可能提供血管壁的额外定量参数。在本研究中,建立了一个框架,用于半自动分割健康主动脉(n = 10)和腹主动脉瘤(n = 16)的探头跟踪图像,之后使用心率检测和包络检测自动评估舒张末期(ED)、收缩末期(ES)和平均动脉压(MAP)状态下患者特定的血管几何形状。配准后,将腹主动脉瘤的几何形状与金标准计算机断层扫描(CT)进行比较。根据评估的健康主动脉和腹主动脉瘤的舒张末期和收缩末期几何形状,并使用测量的肱动脉脉压值,计算局部力学特性,即顺应性、扩张性和周向应变。整体上,计算了体积、顺应性和扩张性。几何形状与CT几何形状高度一致,中位相似性指数和四分位间距为0.91 [0.90 - 0.92],平均豪斯多夫距离和四分位间距为4.7 [3.9 - 5.6] mm。正如预期的那样,与腹主动脉瘤相比,健康血管的扩张性(健康主动脉:80 ± 15·10 kPa;腹主动脉瘤:29 ± 9.6·10 kPa)和周向应变(健康主动脉:0.25 ± 0.03;腹主动脉瘤:0.15 ± 0.03)更大。周向应变值与文献一致。健康主动脉的整体扩张性与腹主动脉瘤有显著差异,威尔科克森检验证明了这一点(p值 = 2·10)。改善图像对比度和横向分辨率有助于进一步改进分割,以改善力学特征描述。所展示的工作表明,除了准确的几何评估外,徒手二维超声成像还是一种用于腹主动脉瘤额外力学特性表征的有前景的工具。