University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA.
J Surg Educ. 2022 Mar-Apr;79(2):342-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
It is common for North American surgical trainees to interrupt clinical training to complete 2 or more years of research training. The impact of this practice on surgical aptitudes is unknown. The University of Toronto has large general surgery and surgeon scientist training programs. We compared the examination scores of general surgery residents in continuous clinical training with those of residents whose training was interrupted by research.
We collected anonymized scores obtained at written and oral annual in-training examinations by general surgery residents at the University of Toronto from 2011 to 2016, inclusive. The written exam assessed knowledge, while the oral exam assessed judgment. Residents were dichotomized into continuous versus non-continuous clinical training streams. We compared performance prior to, during, and following divergence for research training both within and between the 2 groups.
At the junior resident level, future enrollment in research training was associated with higher examination performance (P = .003). Annual scores plateaued during research training, while scores of residents who continued in continuous clinical training improved year over year (P = .009). Non-continuous stream resident exam scores remained stagnant after 1 year then improved in the second year after return to clinical training (P = .00007). Scores obtained in the final year of residency training did not significantly differ between residents who underwent continuous versus non-continuous clinical training. Results from written and oral exams trended concordantly.
We demonstrate that interruption of clinical training for 2 or more years of research is associated with a stagnation of performance on annual in-training examinations assessing both knowledge and judgment. This phenomenon is followed by an eventual catching-up after at least 2 years return to full-time clinical training. This may inform residency program curriculum design.
北美外科培训医师中断临床培训以完成 2 年或更长时间的研究培训是很常见的。这种做法对手术能力的影响尚不清楚。多伦多大学有大型的普通外科和外科医生科学家培训计划。我们比较了连续临床培训的普通外科住院医师和因研究而中断培训的住院医师的考试成绩。
我们收集了 2011 年至 2016 年多伦多大学普通外科住院医师参加书面和口头年度培训考试的匿名成绩,包括。书面考试评估知识,而口头考试评估判断。住院医师被分为连续和非连续临床培训流。我们比较了在研究培训期间和之后,在这两组内和组间,在分歧之前、期间和之后的表现。
在初级住院医师水平,未来参加研究培训与较高的考试成绩相关(P=0.003)。研究培训期间,年度成绩趋于平稳,而继续接受连续临床培训的住院医师的成绩逐年提高(P=0.009)。非连续流住院医师的考试成绩在回到临床培训后的第二年才停滞不前,然后在第二年有所提高(P=0.00007)。在连续和非连续临床培训的住院医师中,在住院医师培训的最后一年获得的成绩没有显著差异。书面和口头考试的结果呈一致趋势。
我们证明,中断临床培训 2 年或更长时间进行研究与年度培训考试成绩的停滞有关,这些考试评估知识和判断。在至少 2 年的全职临床培训回归后,这种现象随后会出现最终赶上。这可能会影响住院医师培训课程的设计。