• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)组织如何回应患者的关切?患者咨询和联络服务(PALS)的定性访谈研究。

How do National Health Service (NHS) organisations respond to patient concerns? A qualitative interview study of the Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS).

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 25;11(11):e053239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053239.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053239
PMID:34824119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8627391/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the current work of the Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) and assess the service's potential to resolve concerns and contribute to organisational learning.

DESIGN

A qualitative study using semistructured interviews.

SETTING

Four mental health trusts and four acute trusts in the English National Health Service, a total of eight PALS across different trusts.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-four participants comprising of PALS staff and clinicians working with PALS teams.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were undertaken with participants using video conferencing software. The framework method was used for the analysis of the large qualitative dataset, which is a conventional method of analysis, similar to thematic or qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

PALS teams fulfil their core responsibilities by acting as point of contact for patients, providing information and resolving a variety of recurrent problems, including PALS staff communication, staff attitudes and waiting times. The remit and responsibilities of each PALS has often broadened over time. Barriers to resolving concerns included a lack of awareness of PALS, limited to no policies informing how staff resolve concerns, an emphasis on complaints and the attitude of clinical staff. Senior management had widely differing views on how the PALS should operate and the management of complaints is a much higher priority. Few PALS teams carried out any analysis of the data or shared data within their organisations.

CONCLUSIONS

PALS teams fulfil their core responsibilities by acting as point of contact for patients, providing information and resolving concerns. PALS staff also act as navigators of services, mediators between families and staff and, occasionally, patient advocates in supporting them to raise concerns. PALS has the potential to reduce complaints, increase patient satisfaction and provide rapid organisational feedback. Achieving this potential will require more awareness and support within organisations together with updated national policy guidance.

摘要

目的

描述患者咨询和联络服务(PALS)的当前工作,并评估该服务解决问题和促进组织学习的潜力。

设计

使用半结构化访谈的定性研究。

设置

英国国民保健服务系统中的四个心理健康信托和四个急性信托,共有八个不同信托的 PALS。

参与者

24 名参与者包括与 PALS 团队合作的 PALS 工作人员和临床医生。

方法

使用视频会议软件对参与者进行半结构化访谈。框架方法用于分析大型定性数据集,这是一种常规分析方法,类似于主题或定性内容分析。

结果

PALS 团队通过充当患者的联系点、提供信息和解决各种常见问题来履行其核心职责,包括 PALS 工作人员沟通、工作人员态度和等待时间等问题。每个 PALS 的职权范围和职责随着时间的推移往往会扩大。解决问题的障碍包括对 PALS 的认识不足、缺乏指导员工解决问题的政策、对投诉的重视以及临床工作人员的态度。高级管理人员对 PALS 应该如何运作以及投诉的管理有截然不同的看法。很少有 PALS 团队对数据进行任何分析或在组织内共享数据。

结论

PALS 团队通过充当患者的联系点、提供信息和解决问题来履行其核心职责。PALS 工作人员还充当服务导航员、家庭和工作人员之间的调解人,偶尔在支持他们提出关切时充当患者的倡导者。PALS 有可能减少投诉、提高患者满意度并提供快速的组织反馈。要实现这一潜力,需要在组织内部提高认识和支持,并更新国家政策指导。

相似文献

1
How do National Health Service (NHS) organisations respond to patient concerns? A qualitative interview study of the Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS).英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)组织如何回应患者的关切?患者咨询和联络服务(PALS)的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 25;11(11):e053239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053239.
2
Access to and use of NHS Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS): the views of children, young people, parents and PALS staff.国民保健服务体系患者咨询与联络服务(PALS)的使用情况及体验:儿童、青少年、家长及PALS工作人员的看法
Child Care Health Dev. 2008 Mar;34(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00749.x.
3
Patient Advice and Liaison Services: strengthening the voices of individual service users in health-care organizations.患者咨询与联络服务:增强个体服务使用者在医疗保健机构中的声音。
Health Expect. 2006 Jun;9(2):138-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00384.x.
4
National survey of Patient Advice and Liaison Services (PALS) in England: children, young people and parents' access to and use of PALS.英格兰患者咨询与联络服务(PALS)全国调查:儿童、青少年及家长对PALS的使用与获取情况
Child Care Health Dev. 2004 Sep;30(5):495-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00444.x.
5
Quality criteria for patient advice and liaison services: what do patients and the public want?患者咨询与联络服务的质量标准:患者及公众期望什么?
Health Expect. 2005 Jun;8(2):126-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00321.x.
6
Views and Uses of Sepsis Digital Alerts in National Health Service Trusts in England: Qualitative Study With Health Care Professionals.英格兰国民保健署信托机构中脓毒症数字警报的看法和用途:医护专业人员的定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Oct 15;11:e56949. doi: 10.2196/56949.
7
Do patient surveys work? The influence of a national survey programme on local quality-improvement initiatives.患者调查有用吗?一项全国性调查计划对地方质量改进举措的影响。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):437-41. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022749.
8
9
Patient Advice and Liaison Services: results of an audit survey in England.患者咨询与联络服务:英格兰一项审计调查的结果
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):304-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00505.x.
10
Integrated liaison psychiatry services in England: a qualitative study of the views of liaison practitioners and acute hospital staffs from four distinctly different kinds of liaison service.英格兰的综合联络精神病学服务:对来自四种截然不同联络服务的联络医生和急性医院工作人员的观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 25;19(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4356-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient safety incident reporting systems and reporting practices in African healthcare organisations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非洲医疗机构中的患者安全事件报告系统及报告实践:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Feb 26;14(1):e003202. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003202.
2
Embedding into the ways of working in the NHS: A seamless transition and reflective learning as a clinical observer in general internal medicine.融入英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的工作方式:作为普通内科临床观察员的无缝过渡与反思性学习。
Future Healthc J. 2025 Jan 10;12(1):100222. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100222. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Understanding healthcare professionals' responses to patient complaints in secondary and tertiary care in the UK: A systematic review and behavioural analysis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.了解英国二级和三级医疗保健机构中医护人员对患者投诉的反应:一项使用理论领域框架的系统评价和行为分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Oct 1;22(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01209-4.
4
Consultations With Muslims From Minoritised Ethnic Communities Living in Deprived Areas: Identifying Inequities in Mental Health Care and Support.少数民族聚居贫困地区穆斯林咨询服务:发现精神卫生保健和支持方面的不平等。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14132. doi: 10.1111/hex.14132.
5
Sources of diagnostic delay for people with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: Qualitative research study.炎症性肠病患者诊断延迟的原因:定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0301672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301672. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Wild data: how front-line hospital staff make sense of patients' experiences.野数据:一线医护人员如何理解患者的体验。
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Jul;42(6):1424-1440. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13115. Epub 2020 May 31.
2
Exploring the roles, functions, and background of patient navigators and case managers: A scoping review.探索患者导航员和个案经理的角色、功能和背景:范围综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Oct;98:27-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
3
Helping patients help themselves: Supporting the healthcare journey.帮助患者自助:支持医疗保健之旅。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Sep;101(9):1708-1711. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
4
What can patients tell us about the quality and safety of hospital care? Findings from a UK multicentre survey study.患者能告诉我们关于医院护理质量和安全的什么信息?来自英国多中心调查研究的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Sep;27(9):673-682. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006974. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
The effectiveness of patient navigation programs for adult cancer patients undergoing treatment: a systematic review.成人癌症患者治疗期间患者导航项目的有效性:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):295-321. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2324.
6
Beyond metrics? Utilizing 'soft intelligence' for healthcare quality and safety.超越指标?利用“软智能”提升医疗质量与安全。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Oct;142:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.027. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
7
Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy.医疗保健系统中的患者投诉:系统评价与编码分类法
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Aug;23(8):678-89. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437. Epub 2014 May 29.
8
Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: they must be used to improve care.收集患者体验数据是不够的:必须利用这些数据来改善医疗服务。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 26;348:g2225. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2225.
9
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
10
Patient concerns at hospital admission.患者入院时的担忧。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Aug 8;171(15):1399-400. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.337.