Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, UK.
Centre for Health Economics and Policy Innovation, Imperial College Business School, London, UK.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Aug;31(8):590-598. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013942. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
Hospital admissions in many countries fell dramatically at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Less is known about how care patterns differed by patient groups. We sought to determine whether areas with higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation or larger ethnic minority populations saw larger falls in emergency and planned admissions in England.
We conducted a national observational study of hospital care in the English National Health Service (NHS) in 2019-2020. Weekly volumes of elective (planned) and emergency admissions in 2020 compared with 2019 were calculated for each census area. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to estimate the reductions in volumes for areas in different quintiles of socioeconomic deprivation and ethnic minority populations after controlling for national time trends and local area composition.
Between March and December 2020, there were 35.5% (3.0 million) fewer elective admissions and 22.0% (1.2 million) fewer emergency admissions with a non-COVID-19 primary diagnosis than in 2019. Areas with the largest share of ethnic minority populations experienced a 36.7% (95% CI 24.1% to 49.3%) larger reduction in non-primary COVID-19 emergency admissions compared with those with the smallest. The most deprived areas experienced a 10.1% (95% CI 2.6% to 17.7%) smaller reduction in non-COVID-19 emergency admissions compared with the least deprived. These patterns are not explained by differential prevalence of COVID-19 cases by area.
Even in a healthcare system founded on the principle of equal access for equal need, the impact of COVID-19 on NHS hospital care for non-COVID patients has not been spread evenly by ethnicity and deprivation in England. While we cannot conclusively determine the mechanisms behind these differences, they risk exacerbating prepandemic health inequalities.
在许多国家,COVID-19 大流行开始时,医院入院人数急剧下降。关于不同患者群体的护理模式有何不同,人们知之甚少。我们试图确定在英国,社会经济贫困程度较高或少数民族人口较多的地区,急诊和计划入院人数下降幅度是否更大。
我们对 2019-2020 年英格兰国民保健制度(NHS)的医院护理进行了全国性观察研究。计算了每个普查区 2020 年与 2019 年相比的选择性(计划)和急诊入院量。在控制全国时间趋势和当地区域构成后,使用多元线性回归分析来估计不同社会经济贫困程度五分位数和少数民族人口比例的地区的入院量减少情况。
2020 年 3 月至 12 月,非 COVID-19 主要诊断的择期入院减少了 35.5%(300 万例),急诊入院减少了 22.0%(120 万例)。少数民族人口比例最高的地区经历了非主要 COVID-19 急诊入院人数减少了 36.7%(95%CI 24.1%至 49.3%),而少数民族人口比例最低的地区则减少了 10.1%(95%CI 2.6%至 17.7%)。与最贫困地区相比,最贫困地区的非 COVID-19 急诊入院人数减少幅度较小,为 10.1%(95%CI 2.6%至 17.7%)。这些模式不能用地区 COVID-19 病例的差异患病率来解释。
即使在以平等需求为基础的平等获得医疗保健服务的原则下,英格兰 NHS 医院对非 COVID 患者的护理服务因种族和贫困程度的不同而受到的 COVID-19 影响也并不均衡。虽然我们不能确定这些差异背后的机制,但它们有可能加剧大流行前的健康不平等。