• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学教职员工对诊断辐射风险及防护措施的认知(瓦西特省)。

KNOWLEDGE ABOUT RISK AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES RELATED TO DIAGNOSTIC RADIATION AMONG MEDICAL STAFF IN TEACHING HOSPITALS (WASIT PROVINCE).

机构信息

WASIT UNIVERSITY, BAGHDAD, IRAQ.

AL-TURATH UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, BAGHDAD, IRAQ.

出版信息

Wiad Lek. 2021;74(9 cz 2):2345-2351.

PMID:34824182
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim: The goal of this research is to find out how much medical staff is acknowledged about radiation protection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: In Teaching Hospitals, Wasit Province, a questionnaire study in 165 medical personnel was conducted. Part 1 of the questionnaire included sociodemographic information such as age, gender, and employment, whereas part 2 included 16 knowledge-related questions, divided into two sections: health risk (8 questions) and preventative strategies (8 questions). The descriptive analysis was carried out according to the data types: qualitative data were described using frequency and percentages, while quantitative data was described using the mean and standard deviation. The Chi-square test or Fisher's Exact Test were employed to analyze the relationship between the variables. Participants were given a score of 1 for all accurate answers, and a score of 0 for wrong and "don't know" responses. There were 165 participants general, among them 93 males and 72 females; with a mean age of 35.489.570.

RESULTS

Results: Only 27 people (16.36%) had a good knowledge score, while more than half (61.21%) earned an average knowledge score. 30% of radiology technicians had a good level of knowledge, and 26.5 % of those working in radiology units had a good level of expertise as well. Increasing the frequency of radiation exposure showed to have a strong relationship with participant knowledge score, with those with repeated exposure during the day having the greatest proportion (21.4%) of good knowledge.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: This study had shown that there is a need to increase awareness about risks of radiation exposures among those who works in this field. Considering the above, the study recommends making training about the risks and methods of radiation protection compulsory, especially for workers in radiography units. In addition, the curricula of medical institutes must be updated and the latest research findings on ways to prevent radiation should be added. Finally, the issue of exposure to radiation is very important and dangerous, therefore, all sectors of society must join for the best awareness of its risks.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在了解医务人员对辐射防护的认知程度。

对象和方法

在瓦西特省的教学医院中,对 165 名医务人员进行了问卷调查。问卷的第一部分包括人口统计学信息,如年龄、性别和职业;第二部分包括 16 个与知识相关的问题,分为健康风险(8 个问题)和预防策略(8 个问题)两个部分。根据数据类型进行描述性分析:定性数据用频率和百分比描述,定量数据用均值和标准差描述。采用卡方检验或 Fisher 精确检验分析变量之间的关系。所有正确答案得 1 分,错误和“不知道”答案得 0 分。共有 165 名参与者,其中男性 93 人,女性 72 人;平均年龄为 35.489.570 岁。

结果

只有 27 人(16.36%)具有较好的知识得分,而超过一半(61.21%)的人得分中等。放射技师中有 30%的人具有较好的知识水平,放射科工作人员中有 26.5%的人具有较好的专业知识水平。辐射暴露频率的增加与参与者的知识得分呈强相关,每天重复暴露的参与者中,具有较好知识的比例最高(21.4%)。

结论

本研究表明,有必要提高从事该领域工作的人员对辐射暴露风险的认识。考虑到上述情况,本研究建议强制进行辐射防护风险和方法的培训,特别是针对放射科工作人员。此外,医学机构的课程必须更新,并增加有关预防辐射的最新研究结果。最后,辐射暴露问题非常重要和危险,因此,社会各界必须共同提高对其风险的认识。

相似文献

1
KNOWLEDGE ABOUT RISK AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES RELATED TO DIAGNOSTIC RADIATION AMONG MEDICAL STAFF IN TEACHING HOSPITALS (WASIT PROVINCE).医学教职员工对诊断辐射风险及防护措施的认知(瓦西特省)。
Wiad Lek. 2021;74(9 cz 2):2345-2351.
2
Health-related quality of life among radiology technicians in Turkish hospitals: a cross sectional study.土耳其医院放射技师的健康相关生活质量:一项横断面研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Aug;94(6):1415-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01723-w. Epub 2021 May 27.
3
Radiation safety in an era of diagnostic radiology growth in Africa: Lessons learned from Tanzania.非洲放射诊断学发展时代的辐射安全:坦桑尼亚的经验教训。
Clin Imaging. 2023 Oct;102:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.08.006. Epub 2023 Aug 20.
4
Awareness of radiation protection and dose levels of imaging procedures among medical students, radiography students, and radiology residents at an academic hospital: Results of a comprehensive survey.一所学术医院的医学生、放射技术专业学生和放射科住院医师对辐射防护及成像检查剂量水平的认知:一项综合调查结果
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan;86:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.10.033. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
5
Assessment of the awareness of radiation protection and related concepts among nursing staff mainly working in diagnostic imaging units, cath-labs and operation theatres in Sri Lanka: A survey-based study.斯里兰卡主要在诊断成像科室、心导管实验室和手术室工作的护理人员对辐射防护及相关概念的认知评估:一项基于调查的研究。
Radiography (Lond). 2023 Mar;29(2):319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
6
Improving Radiation Awareness and Feeling of Personal Security of Non-Radiological Medical Staff by Implementing a Traffic Light System in Computed Tomography.通过在计算机断层扫描中实施交通灯系统来提高非放射医学工作人员的辐射意识和个人安全感。
Rofo. 2016 Mar;188(3):280-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-110450. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
7
Patient Perceptions and Knowledge of Ionizing Radiation From Medical Imaging.患者对医学影像辐射的认知和理解。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128561. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28561.
8
Radiation safety awareness among medical staff.医务人员的辐射安全意识。
Pol J Radiol. 2015 Feb 1;80:57-61. doi: 10.12659/PJR.892758. eCollection 2015.
9
Assessing radiation protection knowledge in diagnostic radiography in the Republic of Cyprus. A questionnaire survey.评估塞浦路斯共和国诊断放射学中的辐射防护知识。问卷调查。
Radiography (Lond). 2020 May;26(2):e88-e93. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
10
Knowledge about Ultraviolet Radiation Hazards and Tanning Behavior of Cosmetology and Medical Students.美容专业和医学专业学生对紫外线辐射危害及晒黑行为的认知
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2016 Apr;24(1):73-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Analysis with Quantitative Indexes for Public's Awareness of Radiation Knowledge in Taiwan.台湾民众对辐射知识认知的定量指标分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;19(20):13422. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013422.