• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于锥形束计算机断层扫描的上颌骨外侧正畸微型种植体植入安全区评估:一项回顾性形态测量研究

A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Assessment of Safe Zones for Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement in the Lateral Maxilla: A Retrospective Morphometric Study.

作者信息

Jakovljevic Iva, Milanovic Pavle, Vasiljevic Milica, Milanovic Jovana, Stevanovic Momir Z, Jovicic Nemanja, Stepovic Milos, Ristic Vladimir, Selakovic Dragica, Rosic Gvozden, Arnaut Aleksandra

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.

Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 15;15(10):1252. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15101252.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15101252
PMID:40428245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12110168/
Abstract

Orthodontic temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in the lateral maxillary region are useful tools for successful orthodontic treatment. Radiological anatomical knowledge is crucial for the successful placement of TADs. The use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is essential for evaluating the relationship between the ideal placement point (IPP) and dental structures, particularly in cases with anatomical limitations. Accordingly, this study aims to assess the anatomical conditions for orthodontic mini-implant (MI) insertion in the posterior maxilla using CBCT as the gold standard. This retrospective study included 62 patients (37.1% male, 62.9% female) aged 11 to 50 years. CBCT scans (sagittal and axial cross-sections) were used to evaluate interdental bone characteristics in different regions. The evaluated regions were defined as follows: Region 1 (canine and first premolar), Region 2 (first and second premolars), Region 3 (second premolar and first molar), and Region 4 (first and second molars). All parameters were assessed at three predefined levels: A, B, and C, located 4, 3, and 2 mm, respectively, from the alveolar crest. At the aforementioned levels, we performed measurements, such as the interdental width (IDW) in the mesiodistal direction and buccopalatal depth (BPD). The last observation was the relationship between the ideal TAD placement point (IPP) and dental structures, such as contact points (CPs) and cusp tips (C1-cusp of mesial tooth, C2-cusp of distal tooth, in each region). A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the IDW and BPD at Levels A, B, and C in Region 1, while a negative correlation was observed between the IDW and BPD at Level C in Region 2'. The highest percentages of IDW exceeding 3 mm were found in Region 4 at Level A (67.7%), followed by Region 1' and 2', both at Level A. The mean interdental width measured at each level on the right and left sides was highest at Level A, exceeding 3 mm, and the width decreased with each successive level. The mean BPD measured at each level on the right and left sides was also highest at Level A. This methodological approach could assist in ensuring precise and efficient implant insertion. Furthermore, it can be concluded that the safe zone for buccal and interdental mini-implant placement is located 4 mm from the alveolar crest at Level A. Also, the CBCT analysis algorithm may serve as a valuable tool for clinicians in determining optimal TAD placement in different dental regions.

摘要

上颌外侧区域的正畸临时锚固装置(TADs)是正畸治疗成功的有用工具。放射解剖学知识对于TADs的成功植入至关重要。使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)对于评估理想植入点(IPP)与牙齿结构之间的关系至关重要,特别是在存在解剖学限制的情况下。因此,本研究旨在以CBCT作为金标准,评估上颌后部正畸微型种植体(MI)植入的解剖条件。这项回顾性研究纳入了62例年龄在11至50岁之间的患者(男性占37.1%,女性占62.9%)。使用CBCT扫描(矢状面和横断面)评估不同区域的牙间骨特征。评估区域定义如下:区域1(尖牙和第一前磨牙)、区域2(第一和第二前磨牙)、区域3(第二前磨牙和第一磨牙)以及区域4(第一和第二磨牙)。所有参数均在三个预定义水平进行评估:A、B和C,分别距离牙槽嵴4、3和2 mm。在上述水平,我们进行了测量,如近远中方向的牙间宽度(IDW)和颊腭深度(BPD)。最后观察的是理想TAD植入点(IPP)与牙齿结构之间的关系,如接触点(CPs)和牙尖(每个区域中,C1-近中牙齿的牙尖,C2-远中牙齿的牙尖)。在区域1的A、B和C水平,IDW与BPD之间发现具有统计学意义的正相关,而在区域2的C水平,IDW与BPD之间观察到负相关。在A水平,IDW超过3 mm的百分比在区域4中最高(67.7%),其次是区域1和2在A水平的情况。左右两侧在每个水平测量的平均牙间宽度在A水平最高,超过3 mm,并且随着每个连续水平宽度减小。左右两侧在每个水平测量的平均BPD在A水平也最高。这种方法有助于确保种植体的精确和高效植入。此外,可以得出结论,颊侧和牙间微型种植体植入的安全区位于A水平距离牙槽嵴4 mm处。而且,CBCT分析算法可能成为临床医生在确定不同牙区最佳TAD植入位置时的有价值工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c91/12110168/5c9dea17d91d/diagnostics-15-01252-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c91/12110168/bdc75cda7411/diagnostics-15-01252-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c91/12110168/186d0e4b98a0/diagnostics-15-01252-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c91/12110168/c6ecfe7f1739/diagnostics-15-01252-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c91/12110168/5bc503eba305/diagnostics-15-01252-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c91/12110168/5c9dea17d91d/diagnostics-15-01252-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c91/12110168/bdc75cda7411/diagnostics-15-01252-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c91/12110168/186d0e4b98a0/diagnostics-15-01252-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c91/12110168/c6ecfe7f1739/diagnostics-15-01252-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c91/12110168/5bc503eba305/diagnostics-15-01252-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c91/12110168/5c9dea17d91d/diagnostics-15-01252-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Assessment of Safe Zones for Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement in the Lateral Maxilla: A Retrospective Morphometric Study.基于锥形束计算机断层扫描的上颌骨外侧正畸微型种植体植入安全区评估:一项回顾性形态测量研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 15;15(10):1252. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15101252.
2
Assessment of interradicular areas and cortical bone thickness for orthodontic mini-implant placement: a cone-beam computed tomography study.正畸微型种植体植入时根间区域和皮质骨厚度的评估:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 28;25(1):825. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06251-4.
3
Three-dimensional digital imaging analysis of the palatal bone thickness for orthodontic mini-implant insertion - determination of the safe zone and angulation.正畸微种植体植入的硬腭骨厚度的三维数字化成像分析-安全区和角度的确定。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1448. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05229-y.
4
Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.正畸微型种植体植入的评估:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)研究。
Prog Orthod. 2014 Nov 18;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0061-x.
5
Optimal sites for mini-implant insertion into the infrazygomatic crest according to different craniofacial morphologies: A cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography study.根据不同颅面形态确定微型种植体植入颧下嵴的最佳部位:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描横断面研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2025 Mar;167(3):261-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.09.016. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
6
Evaluation of interradicular space, soft tissue, and hard tissue of the posterior palatal alveolar process for orthodontic mini-implant, using cone-beam computed tomography.应用锥形束 CT 评价腭后牙槽嵴的根间间隙、软组织和硬组织用于正畸微种植体。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Apr;159(4):460-469. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.01.019. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
7
Safe sites for orthodontic miniscrew insertion in the infrazygomatic crest area in different facial types: A tomographic study.不同面型在下颌颧突区安全植入正畸微螺钉的部位:一项断层研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Jan;161(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.044. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
8
Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对上颌牙根间骨进行定量评估以确定正畸微型种植体的双皮质放置。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Jun;147(6):725-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.02.018.
9
Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.通过锥形束计算机断层扫描评估正畸微种植体的最佳植入部位。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Sep;80(5):939-51. doi: 10.2319/121009-709.1.
10
Evaluation of Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Morphology and Residual Bone for Implant Placement by Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).通过锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估上颌牙槽嵴形态和剩余骨量用于种植体植入。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;32(2):61-71. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022039223.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of conventional two-dimensional and digital three-dimensional imaging in orthodontics : A systematic review and meta-analysis.正畸学中传统二维成像与数字三维成像的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Feb 20. doi: 10.1007/s00056-024-00574-7.
2
Use of CBCT in Orthodontics: A Scoping Review.锥形束计算机断层扫描在正畸学中的应用:一项范围综述。
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 18;13(22):6941. doi: 10.3390/jcm13226941.
3
An Overview of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Dental Panoramic Radiography in Dentistry in the Community.
锥形束计算机断层扫描和口腔全景放射摄影在社区牙科中的概述。
Tomography. 2024 Aug 7;10(8):1222-1237. doi: 10.3390/tomography10080092.
4
Comparison between effects of mini-implant anchorage and face-bow anchorage in orthodontics for children.微型种植体支抗与面弓支抗在儿童正畸治疗中的效果比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jan;48(1):198-203. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.022. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
5
Should Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Be Performed Prior to Orthodontic Miniscrew Placement in the Infrazygomatic Crest Area?-A Systematic Review.在颧下嵴区域进行正畸微螺钉植入前是否应进行锥形束计算机断层扫描?-一项系统评价。
Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 26;11(9):2389. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11092389.
6
Natural reference structures for three-dimensional maxillary regional superimposition in growing patients.生长患者上颌区域性三维重叠的自然参考结构。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 8;23(1):655. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03367-3.
7
Modern Anchorage Systems in Orthodontics.现代正畸锚固系统
Cureus. 2022 Nov 14;14(11):e31476. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31476. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
MH cortical screws, a revolutionary orthodontic TADs design.MH皮质骨螺钉,一种革命性的正畸微种植体设计。
J Orthod Sci. 2022 Oct 13;11:53. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_49_22. eCollection 2022.
9
Two-dimensional radiographs versus cone-beam computed tomography in planning mini-implant placement: A systematic review.在计划微型种植体植入时二维放射照片与锥形束计算机断层扫描的对比:一项系统评价。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Aug 1;14(8):e669-e677. doi: 10.4317/jced.59384. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
Revisiting the Complications of Orthodontic Miniscrew.重新审视正畸微螺钉的并发症。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 1;2022:8720412. doi: 10.1155/2022/8720412. eCollection 2022.