Functional and Cost Audit of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Public vs Private Hospitals: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND

Government funded hospitals are believed to be stigmatised with 'substandard care' and constant fear of infection. The aim of this study is to compare the results and direct expenditure incurred for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) done at a government funded public teaching hospital with an economy packaged private hospital in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of electronic and physical records of the patients operated by the senior author for primary TKA at a government funded hospital and a private hospital spanning 2007 to 2019 was done. A retrospective cohort study was designed matching the implant design and the ASA grade of the patients. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Hospital for Special Surgery score (HSS), Knee Society Score (KSS) at 2 years follow-up were the primary outcome parameters. The retrieved data describing the cost of surgery and perioperative complications were analyzed. The confounders were minimized by including only the surgeries performed by the author, using the same instruments and implants in similar operating theatre environments.

RESULTS

This study involved two cohorts comprising 280 patients each, with no differences in gender, ASA grade and primary diagnosis. There was no significant difference in the 2-year HSS, KSS and KOOS score between the two groups. The 2-year cumulative incidence of major and minor complications in both the study cohorts showed no significant difference. The mean cost of an uncomplicated primary TKA (2019) in government hospital was INR. 85,927; 39.476% of that required in a private setup (INR. 2,17,667).

CONCLUSION

Affordable TKA package in a government funded hospital can produce results comparable to that in a private hospital setup at a reasonably lower cost without increasing the complication rates.