• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者、护理人员及医疗保健专业人员对癫痫治疗的自满情绪。

Epilepsy Treatment Complacency in Patients, Caregivers, and Health Care Professionals.

作者信息

Penovich Patricia E, Stern John M, Becker Danielle A, Long Lucretia, Santilli Nancy, McGuire Lynanne, Peck Eugenia Y

机构信息

Minnesota Epilepsy Group (PEP), Saint Paul; Department of Neurology (JMS), University of California at Los Angeles; Penn Epilepsy Center (DAB), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (LL), The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus; Human Care Systems Inc. (NS), San Francisco, CA; MedVal Scientific Information Services (LM), Princeton, NJ; and Health Division (EYP), Kantar Health, New York, NY.

出版信息

Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;11(5):377-384. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001066.

DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001066
PMID:34824892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8610521/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the perspectives of adult patients with epilepsy, caregivers, and health care professionals (HCPs) on treatment for seizures and treatment decisions, we developed and administered the STEP Survey (Seize the Truth of Epilepsy Perceptions).

METHODS

Participants were recruited from online panel M3 and by Rare Patient Voice and completed the self-administered online STEP Survey. Analysis of variance and chi-square tests were used for group comparisons.

RESULTS

The STEP Survey was completed by 400 adult patients, 201 caregivers, and 258 HCPs. Patients estimated reporting 45% of their seizures to their HCP, whereas caregivers estimated 83% and HCPs estimated 73% were reported. The most common reason for not reporting seizures was that the seizures were not serious enough to mention (patients 57%; caregivers 66%). A minority of patients (25%) and caregivers (30%) were very or extremely likely to ask their HCP about changing antiseizure medication (ASM) in the next 12 months. The HCP was most frequently selected by patients, caregivers, and HCPs as the person who initiates discussion of changing ASMs (patients 73%/caregivers 66%/HCPs 75%) and increasing ASM dosage (patients 77%/caregivers 68%/HCPs 81%). A majority of patients (65%) and caregivers (68%) somewhat or strongly agreed that they do not change ASMs due to fear of getting worse. HCPs perceive this fear less often, stating that 50% of their patients feel afraid when a second ASM was added.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved reporting of all seizures, discussion of treatment changes, and the impact of fear on treatment decisions provide opportunities to reduce complacency and optimize patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

为了探究成年癫痫患者、护理人员以及医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对于癫痫发作治疗及治疗决策的看法,我们开发并实施了STEP调查(癫痫认知真相调查)。

方法

参与者通过在线小组M3和罕见病患者之声招募,并完成了自行填写的在线STEP调查。采用方差分析和卡方检验进行组间比较。

结果

400名成年患者、201名护理人员和258名医疗保健专业人员完成了STEP调查。患者估计向其医疗保健专业人员报告了45%的癫痫发作,而护理人员估计报告了83%,医疗保健专业人员估计报告了73%。未报告癫痫发作的最常见原因是发作不够严重,无需提及(患者为57%;护理人员为66%)。少数患者(25%)和护理人员(30%)非常或极其有可能在未来12个月内询问其医疗保健专业人员关于更改抗癫痫药物(ASM)的问题。患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员最常选择医疗保健专业人员作为发起更改ASM讨论(患者73%/护理人员66%/医疗保健专业人员75%)和增加ASM剂量讨论(患者77%/护理人员68%/医疗保健专业人员81%)的人。大多数患者(65%)和护理人员(68%) somewhat或强烈同意他们因担心病情恶化而不更改ASM。医疗保健专业人员较少察觉到这种担忧,称在添加第二种ASM时,50%的患者会感到害怕。

结论

改善所有癫痫发作的报告、治疗更改的讨论以及恐惧对治疗决策的影响,为减少自满情绪和优化患者治疗结果提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f4/8610521/32a52b2a5b93/NEURCLINPRACT2020066167FF5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f4/8610521/691e57bad8c1/NEURCLINPRACT2020066167FF1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f4/8610521/625d818bb7d2/NEURCLINPRACT2020066167FF2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f4/8610521/75522ec0c86e/NEURCLINPRACT2020066167FF3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f4/8610521/2061deb53e08/NEURCLINPRACT2020066167FF4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f4/8610521/32a52b2a5b93/NEURCLINPRACT2020066167FF5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f4/8610521/691e57bad8c1/NEURCLINPRACT2020066167FF1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f4/8610521/625d818bb7d2/NEURCLINPRACT2020066167FF2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f4/8610521/75522ec0c86e/NEURCLINPRACT2020066167FF3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f4/8610521/2061deb53e08/NEURCLINPRACT2020066167FF4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f4/8610521/32a52b2a5b93/NEURCLINPRACT2020066167FF5.jpg

相似文献

1
Epilepsy Treatment Complacency in Patients, Caregivers, and Health Care Professionals.患者、护理人员及医疗保健专业人员对癫痫治疗的自满情绪。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;11(5):377-384. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001066.
2
Patient, caregiver, and healthcare professional perspectives on seizure control and treatment goals.患者、照护者和医疗保健专业人员对癫痫控制和治疗目标的看法。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Apr;117:107816. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107816. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
3
Influence of titration of antiseizure medications on treatment selection: Results of an online survey with clinicians in the United States.抗癫痫药物滴定对治疗选择的影响:一项针对美国临床医生的在线调查结果。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Apr;117:107840. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107840. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
4
To reveal or conceal? Adult patient perspectives on SUDEP disclosure.披露还是隐瞒?成年患者对癫痫性猝死披露的看法。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Sep;86:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
5
Developing Consensus-Based Outcome Domains for Trials in Children and Adolescents With CKD: An International Delphi Survey.制定基于共识的儿童和青少年慢性肾脏病临床试验结局指标:一项国际 Delphi 调查。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Oct;76(4):533-545. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
6
The administration of rescue medication to children with prolonged acute convulsive seizures in a non-hospital setting: an exploratory survey of healthcare professionals' perspectives.非医院环境下对急性惊厥持续发作儿童使用急救药物的情况:医护人员观点的探索性调查
Eur J Pediatr. 2014 Jun;173(6):773-9. doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-2255-5. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
7
Oral Anticancer Medication Adherence, Toxicity Reporting, and Counseling: A Study Comparing Health Care Providers and Patients.口服抗癌药物的依从性、毒性报告及咨询:一项比较医疗服务提供者与患者的研究
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Nov;11(6):498-504. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.004572. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
8
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.评估患者向英国“黄卡计划”报告药物不良反应的情况:文献回顾、描述性和定性分析以及问卷调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200.
9
Experiences and views of patients, carers and healthcare professionals on using modems in domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV): a qualitative study.患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员在家庭无创通气 (NIV) 中使用调制解调器的经验和观点:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Mar;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000510.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

本文引用的文献

1
The management of epilepsy in clinical practice: Do the timing and severity of the disease influence the priorities of patients and the caring physicians? Data from the EPINEEDS study.临床实践中癫痫的管理:疾病的发病时间和严重程度是否影响患者和照护医生的优先事项?来自 EPINEEDS 研究的数据。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Jan;114(Pt A):107201. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107201. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
2
The management of epilepsy in clinical practice: Do the needs manifested by the patients correspond to the priorities of the caring physicians? Findings from the EPINEEDS Study.临床实践中癫痫的管理:患者所表现出的需求与护理医师的优先事项相符吗?EPINEEDS研究的结果。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Jan;102:106641. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106641. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
3
The next level of care in epilepsy: Delays, more delays, delays everywhere.癫痫护理的下一个层面:延误,更多的延误,到处都是延误。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;9(4):284-285. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000625.
4
Promoting faster pathways to surgery: a clinical audit of patients with refractory epilepsy.促进更快的手术途径:难治性癫痫患者的临床审计。
BMC Neurol. 2019 Feb 19;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1255-0.
5
Active Epilepsy and Seizure Control in Adults - United States, 2013 and 2015.2013年和2015年美国成人活动性癫痫与癫痫发作控制情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Apr 20;67(15):437-442. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6715a1.
6
A comparison of waiting times for assessment and epilepsy surgery between a Canadian and a Mexican referral center.加拿大和墨西哥转诊中心评估及癫痫手术等待时间的比较。
Epilepsia Open. 2017 Oct 19;2(4):453-458. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12082. eCollection 2017 Dec.
7
The management of epilepsy in children and adults.儿童和成人癫痫的管理。
Med J Aust. 2018 Mar 19;208(5):226-233. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00951.
8
Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Treated With Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs: A 30-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study.新诊断癫痫患者使用现有和新型抗癫痫药物治疗的治疗结局:一项长达 30 年的纵向队列研究。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 1;75(3):279-286. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3949.
9
Long-term retention rates for antiepileptic drugs: A review of long-term extension studies and comparison with brivaracetam.抗癫痫药物的长期留存率:长期扩展研究综述及与布瓦西坦的比较
Epilepsy Res. 2017 Dec;138:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
10
Evaluating quality of life in epilepsy: The role of screening for adverse drug effects, depression, and anxiety.评估癫痫患者的生活质量:筛查药物不良反应、抑郁和焦虑的作用。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Oct;75:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Aug 15.