Paletta Guedes Ricardo Augusto, Gravina Daniela Marcelo, Paletta Guedes Vanessa Maria, Chaoubah Alfredo
Paletta Guedes Eye Institute, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Federal University of Juiz de Fora, 79, Oscar Vidal Street, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Feb;11(1):271-292. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00424-4. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
This retrospective consecutive study compared standalone implantation of multiple (2-3) trabecular micro-bypass stents (iStent inject ± iStent) (Multi-Stent group) vs trabeculectomy + mitomycin C (Trab group) in moderate to severe open-angle glaucoma (OAG).
Eligible patients underwent Multi-Stent or Trab surgery from 2018 to 2020 and had at least 3-month follow-up; visual field mean deviation (VF MD) - 6 dB or worse; inadequate prior response to maximum medications ± laser procedures; and had trabeculectomy as their next planned intervention. Primary effectiveness, safety-adjusted treatment success, was defined as ≥ 20% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction on the same or fewer medications, without clinically significant safety events (severe complications, secondary surgeries, reinterventions). Secondary effectiveness included mean IOP and medications; qualified and complete attainment of target IOP (≤ 21/18/15/12 mmHg and > 6 mmHg); health-economic and quality-of-life (QoL) measures; and 2-vs-3-stent subgroup analysis.
The baseline groups (n = 70 Multi-Stent/40 Trab) were similar: mean IOP (21.1 mmHg/22.3 mmHg); medications (2.87/3.10 medications); disease stage (30%/35% severe); VF MD (- 10.1 dB/- 10.4 dB); and mean last follow-up (LFU, 13.1 months/15.7 months) (all differences non-significant). Primary effectiveness: treatment success at LFU was 62.9% vs 30.0% in Multi-Stent vs Trab eyes, respectively (p = 0.001). Secondary effectiveness: At LFU in Multi-Stent vs Trab groups, respectively: mean IOP decreased by 31% to 14.2 mmHg (p < 0.001) vs by 43% to 12.5 mmHg (p < 0.001); mean medications decreased by 51% to 1.31 medications (p < 0.001) vs by 84% to 0.43 medications (p < 0.001). Multi-Stent eyes, compared to Trab eyes, had fewer visits ± reinterventions within 3 months (3.6 vs 6.1, p < 0.001); longer time to first reintervention (12.2 months vs 4.5 months, p = 0.01); fewer total reinterventions (0.26 vs 0.75, p = 0.006); and earlier lifting of postoperative restrictions (12.6 vs 32.1 days, p < 0.001). In 2-vs-3-stent analysis, there was a trend toward more 3-stent eyes achieving target IOP than 2-stent eyes. Visual fields remained stable in both Multi-Stent and Trab eyes.
Implanting 2-3 trabecular micro-bypass stents was a viable alternative to trabeculectomy for moderate-to-severe OAG, with clinically appropriate IOP/medication reductions and higher safety-adjusted treatment success vs trabeculectomy.
这项回顾性连续研究比较了在中度至重度开角型青光眼(OAG)患者中单独植入多个(2 - 3个)小梁微旁路支架(iStent inject ± iStent)(多支架组)与小梁切除术联合丝裂霉素C(小梁切除术组)的疗效。
符合条件的患者在2018年至2020年接受了多支架或小梁切除术,并至少随访3个月;视野平均缺损(VF MD)为-6 dB或更差;对最大剂量药物和±激光治疗的先前反应不足;且计划将小梁切除术作为下一次干预措施。主要疗效指标,即安全性调整后的治疗成功定义为在使用相同或更少药物的情况下眼压(IOP)降低≥20%,且无临床显著的安全事件(严重并发症、二次手术、再次干预)。次要疗效指标包括平均眼压和药物使用情况;达到目标眼压(≤21/18/15/12 mmHg且>6 mmHg)的达标率和完全达标率;健康经济和生活质量(QoL)指标;以及2个支架与3个支架亚组分析。
基线组(n = 70例多支架组/40例小梁切除术组)相似:平均眼压(21.1 mmHg/22.3 mmHg);药物使用情况(2.87种/3.10种药物);疾病阶段(30%/35%为重度);VF MD(-10.1 dB/-10.4 dB);以及平均末次随访(LFU,13.1个月/15.7个月)(所有差异均无统计学意义)。主要疗效:多支架组和小梁切除术组在末次随访时的治疗成功率分别为62.9%和30.0%(p = 0.001)。次要疗效:在多支架组和小梁切除术组的末次随访时,分别为:平均眼压降低31%至14.2 mmHg(p < 0.001)和降低43%至12.5 mmHg(p < 0.001);平均药物使用量减少51%至1.31种药物(p < 0.001)和减少84%至0.43种药物(p < 0.001)。与小梁切除术组相比,多支架组在3个月内的就诊和再次干预次数更少(3.6次对6.1次,p < 0.001);首次再次干预的时间更长(12.2个月对4.5个月,p = 0.01);总的再次干预次数更少(0.26次对0.75次,p = 0.006);术后限制解除更早(12.6天对32.1天,p < 0.001)。在2个支架与3个支架的分析中,3个支架组达到目标眼压的趋势比2个支架组更明显。多支架组和小梁切除术组的视野均保持稳定。
对于中度至重度开角型青光眼,植入2 - 3个小梁微旁路支架是小梁切除术的一种可行替代方案,与小梁切除术相比,能在临床上适当降低眼压和减少药物使用,且安全性调整后的治疗成功率更高。