Mohtajeb Maryam, Cibere Jolanda, Mony Michelle, Zhang Honglin, Sullivan Emily, Hunt Michael A, Wilson David R
School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Center for Hip Health and Mobility, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Bone Jt Open. 2021 Nov;2(11):988-996. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.211.BJO-2021-0143.
Cam and pincer morphologies are potential precursors to hip osteoarthritis and important contributors to non-arthritic hip pain. However, only some hips with these pathomorphologies develop symptoms and joint degeneration, and it is not clear why. Anterior impingement between the femoral head-neck contour and acetabular rim in positions of hip flexion combined with rotation is a proposed pathomechanism in these hips, but this has not been studied in active postures. Our aim was to assess the anterior impingement pathomechanism in both active and passive postures with high hip flexion that are thought to provoke impingement.
We recruited nine participants with cam and/or pincer morphologies and with pain, 13 participants with cam and/or pincer morphologies and without pain, and 11 controls from a population-based cohort. We scanned hips in active squatting and passive sitting flexion, adduction, and internal rotation using open MRI and quantified anterior femoroacetabular clearance using the β angle.
In squatting, we found significantly decreased anterior femoroacetabular clearance in painful hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies (mean -11.3° (SD 19.2°)) compared to pain-free hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies (mean 8.5° (SD 14.6°); p = 0.022) and controls (mean 18.6° (SD 8.5°); p < 0.001). In sitting flexion, adduction, and internal rotation, we found significantly decreased anterior clearance in both painful (mean -15.2° (SD 15.3°); p = 0.002) and painfree hips (mean -4.7° (SD 13°); p = 0.010) with cam and/pincer morphologies compared to the controls (mean 7.1° (SD 5.9°)).
Our results support the anterior femoroacetabular impingement pathomechanism in hips with cam and/or pincer morphologies and highlight the effect of posture on this pathomechanism. Cite this article: 2021;2(11):988-996.
凸轮型和钳夹型形态是髋关节骨关节炎的潜在先兆,也是非关节炎性髋关节疼痛的重要原因。然而,只有部分具有这些病理形态的髋关节会出现症状和关节退变,原因尚不清楚。股骨头颈轮廓与髋臼边缘在髋关节屈曲并旋转时的前方撞击是这些髋关节中一种推测的病理机制,但尚未在主动体位中进行研究。我们的目的是评估在被认为会引发撞击的高髋关节屈曲的主动和被动体位下的前方撞击病理机制。
我们从一个基于人群的队列中招募了9名具有凸轮型和/或钳夹型形态且有疼痛的参与者、13名具有凸轮型和/或钳夹型形态但无疼痛的参与者以及11名对照者。我们使用开放式MRI对主动蹲位以及被动坐位屈曲、内收和内旋时的髋关节进行扫描,并使用β角量化股骨头髋臼前方间隙。
在蹲位时,我们发现具有凸轮型和/或钳夹型形态的疼痛髋关节的股骨头髋臼前方间隙(平均-11.3°(标准差19.2°))与具有凸轮型和/或钳夹型形态的无痛髋关节(平均8.5°(标准差14.6°);p = 0.022)及对照者(平均18.6°(标准差8.5°);p < 0.001)相比显著减小。在坐位屈曲、内收和内旋时,我们发现具有凸轮型和/或钳夹型形态的疼痛髋关节(平均-15.2°(标准差15.3°);p = 0.002)和无痛髋关节(平均-4.7°(标准差13°);p = 0.010)的前方间隙与对照者(平均7.1°(标准差5.9°))相比均显著减小。
我们的结果支持具有凸轮型和/或钳夹型形态的髋关节的股骨头髋臼前方撞击病理机制,并突出了体位对该病理机制的影响。引用本文:2021;2(11):988 - 996。