Suppr超能文献

为氧化态辩护。

In defence of oxidation states.

机构信息

University of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK.

出版信息

Dalton Trans. 2022 Jan 4;51(2):400-410. doi: 10.1039/d0dt03914d.

Abstract

In this Perspective, some of the criticisms which have been made concerning the use of oxidation states are addressed, particularly in the context of the teaching of inorganic chemistry. The Oxidation State method and the Covalent Bond Classification method are compared and contrasted, and it is concluded that while each method has its strengths and weaknesses, both are important in teaching and it should be recognized that no single model or method is appropriate in all circumstances.

摘要

在本观点中,针对氧化态的使用所提出的一些批评意见得到了回应,特别是在无机化学教学的背景下。本文比较和对比了氧化态法和共价键分类法,得出的结论是,虽然每种方法都有其优点和缺点,但在教学中两者都很重要,应该认识到,没有单一的模型或方法适用于所有情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验