Suppr超能文献

支气管扩张症成人患者支气管舒张剂的作用机制及临床应用

Rationale and Clinical Use of Bronchodilators in Adults with Bronchiectasis.

机构信息

Respiratory Department, Polytechnic and University La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain.

CIBERES de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Drugs. 2022 Jan;82(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01646-3. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Abstract

Currently, there is much controversy surrounding the therapeutic approach to pulmonary function abnormalities in patients with bronchiectasis and, consequently, whether and when to use bronchodilators in these patients. National and international guidelines on the treatment of bronchiectasis in adults do not recommend the routine use of bronchodilators because there is no evidence that a significant response to a bronchodilator or the presence or hyperresponsiveness of the airway are good predictors of future effective clinical response. However, some guidelines recommend them in the presence of airway obstruction and/or special conditions, which vary according to the guideline in question, although there are no recommendations on optimal dosing and bronchodilator treatment combined with or without inhaled corticosteroids. Nonetheless, in contrast with guideline recommendations, bronchodilators are overused in real-world patients with bronchiectasis even in the absence of airway obstruction, as demonstrated by analysis of national and international registries. This overuse can be explained by the awareness of the existence of a solid pharmacological rationale that supports the use of bronchodilators in the presence of chronic airway obstruction independent of its aetiology. We performed a systematic review of the literature and were able to verify that there are no randomised controlled trials (apart from a small study with methodological limitations and a very recent trial involving a not-very-large number of patients), or any long-term observational studies on the short- or long-term effect of bronchodilators in patients with bronchiectasis. Therefore, we believe that it is essential and even urgent to evaluate the effects of bronchodilators in these patients with appropriately designed studies.

摘要

目前,对于支气管扩张症患者肺功能异常的治疗方法存在很多争议,因此,是否以及何时在这些患者中使用支气管扩张剂存在争议。关于成人支气管扩张症治疗的国家和国际指南不建议常规使用支气管扩张剂,因为没有证据表明支气管扩张剂有显著反应或气道存在或高反应性是未来有效临床反应的良好预测指标。然而,一些指南建议在存在气道阻塞和/或特殊情况下使用支气管扩张剂,这因所涉及的指南而异,尽管对于最佳剂量以及联合或不联合吸入皮质类固醇的支气管扩张剂治疗没有建议。然而,与指南建议相反,即使在没有气道阻塞的情况下,支气管扩张剂在真实世界的支气管扩张症患者中也被过度使用,这可以从对国家和国际登记处的分析中得到证明。这种过度使用可以用存在坚实的药理学依据来解释,该依据支持在存在慢性气道阻塞时使用支气管扩张剂,而不论其病因如何。我们对文献进行了系统回顾,结果证实,除了一项存在方法学局限性的小型研究和一项涉及患者人数不多的非常新的试验外,没有关于支气管扩张剂在支气管扩张症患者中短期或长期效果的随机对照试验,也没有任何长期观察性研究。因此,我们认为,有必要甚至迫切需要通过精心设计的研究来评估支气管扩张剂在这些患者中的作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验